Application of GPC-UV Method for Reservoir Fluid Analysis From Drill Cuttings

Drill cuttings are readily available for all wells we drill. Geochemical analysis has been employed to estimate key oil properties, such as American Petroleum Institute (API) gravity and viscosity. However, most studies focus on drill cuttings with water-based mud (WBM). Identifying reservoir fluids in highly contaminated drill-cutting samples becomes a significant challenge when drilling wells with oil-based mud (OBM). Consequently, there is a high business demand for predicting reservoir fluid properties from drill cuttings with OBM. Recently, gel permeation chromatography (GPC) coupled with ultraviolet (UV) absorbance detection was introduced in the upstream industry. Elias and Gelin (2015) and Elias et al. (2017) demonstrated the capability of the GPC-UV method to predict API gravity from drill-cutting samples with OBM in unconventional reservoirs. This study extended the GPC-UV approach to conventional reservoirs across multiple fields from the Norwegian Continental Shelf and other global assets. We developed a multiple-wavelength method instead of fixed wavelength detection to explore correlations between GPC-UV detections and reservoir fluid properties. The drill cuttings used in this study are from multiple fields from the Norwegian Continental Shelf and other global assets, where OBM was consistently used for well drilling. Consequently, extracts from these cutting samples are contaminated by OBM. Utilizing the GPC-UV method revealed clear oil peaks with the OBM response appearing on the baseline. Correlating these results with GPC-UV data from stock tank oil samples and known reservoir fluid properties enables qualitative determination of fluid type (gas, oil, or water) and estimation of API from new drill-cutting samples.A digital solution based on machine learning, leveraging broad GPC-UV measurements, is needed to improve prediction accuracy further. While ongoing studies aim to establish a comprehensive database of GPC-UV measurements for stock tank oil and drill-cutting extracts, the GPC-UV method demonstrates impressive potential for analyzing reservoir fluids in challenging drill-cutting samples. Given the widespread availability of drill-cutting samples, this new method offers a cost-efficient and accurate means of determining reservoir fluid properties without resorting to downhole measurements or sampling. This method could fulfill the vision of considering “every piece of cutting as a PVT sample,” with applications ranging from well placement and reservoir management to production optimization, flow assurance, and plug and abandonment (P&A).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30632/pjv65n4-2024a12
Primary Topic
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of GPC-UV Method for Reservoir Fluid Analysis From Drill Cuttings

Julian Moore, Alexandra Cely, Eric Michael, Tao Yang
Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
article

Application of GPC-UV Method for Reservoir Fluid Analysis From Drill Cuttings

Julian Moore, Alexandra Cely, Eric Michael, Tao Yang
article en

Abstract

Drill cuttings are readily available for all wells we drill. Geochemical analysis has been employed to estimate key oil properties, such as American Petroleum Institute (API) gravity and viscosity. However, most studies focus on drill cuttings with water-based mud (WBM). Identifying reservoir fluids in highly contaminated drill-cutting samples becomes a significant challenge when drilling wells with oil-based mud (OBM). Consequently, there is a high business demand for predicting reservoir fluid properties from drill cuttings with OBM. Recently, gel permeation chromatography (GPC) coupled with ultraviolet (UV) absorbance detection was introduced in the upstream industry. Elias and Gelin (2015) and Elias et al. (2017) demonstrated the capability of the GPC-UV method to predict API gravity from drill-cutting samples with OBM in unconventional reservoirs. This study extended the GPC-UV approach to conventional reservoirs across multiple fields from the Norwegian Continental Shelf and other global assets. We developed a multiple-wavelength method instead of fixed wavelength detection to explore correlations between GPC-UV detections and reservoir fluid properties. The drill cuttings used in this study are from multiple fields from the Norwegian Continental Shelf and other global assets, where OBM was consistently used for well drilling. Consequently, extracts from these cutting samples are contaminated by OBM. Utilizing the GPC-UV method revealed clear oil peaks with the OBM response appearing on the baseline. Correlating these results with GPC-UV data from stock tank oil samples and known reservoir fluid properties enables qualitative determination of fluid type (gas, oil, or water) and estimation of API from new drill-cutting samples.A digital solution based on machine learning, leveraging broad GPC-UV measurements, is needed to improve prediction accuracy further. While ongoing studies aim to establish a comprehensive database of GPC-UV measurements for stock tank oil and drill-cutting extracts, the GPC-UV method demonstrates impressive potential for analyzing reservoir fluids in challenging drill-cutting samples. Given the widespread availability of drill-cutting samples, this new method offers a cost-efficient and accurate means of determining reservoir fluid properties without resorting to downhole measurements or sampling. This method could fulfill the vision of considering “every piece of cutting as a PVT sample,” with applications ranging from well placement and reservoir management to production optimization, flow assurance, and plug and abandonment (P&A).

Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir DescriptionVol. 65(4)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.