Relative profile measurements in 1.5T MR-linacs: investigation of central axis deviations

<i>Objective</i>. In 1.5 T MR-linacs, the absorbed dose central axis (CAX) deviates from the beam's CAX due to inherent profile asymmetry. In addition, a measured CAX deviation may be biased due to potential lateral (to the beam) effective point of measurement (EPOML) shifts of the detector employed. By investigating CAX deviations, the scope of this study is to determine a set ofEPOMLshifts for profile measurements in 1.5 T MR-linacs.<i>Approach</i>. The Semiflex 3D ion chamber and microDiamond detector (PTW, Germany) were considered in the experimental study while three more detectors were included in the Monte Carlo (MC) study. CAX deviations in the crossline and inline profiles were calculated based on inflection points of the 10×10 cm<sup>2</sup>field, at five centers. In MC simulations, the experimental setup was reproduced. A small water voxel was simulated to calculate CAX deviation without the impact of the detector-specificEPOMLshift.<i>Main results</i>. All measurements were consistent among the five centers. MC-based and experimental measurements were in agreement within uncertainties. Placing the microDiamond in the vertical orientation does not appear to affect the detector'sEPOML, which is on its central longitudinal axis. For the Semiflex 3D in the crossline direction, the CAX deviation was 2.3 mm, i.e. 1 mm larger than the ones measured using the microDiamond and simulated considering the ideal water detector. Thus, anEPOMLshift of 1 mm is recommended for crossline profile measurements under both Semiflex 3D orientations. For the inline profile, anEPOMLshift of -0.5 mm was determined only for the parallel configuration. In the MC study, CAX deviations were found detector- and orientation-dependent. The dead volume is responsible for theEPOMLshift only in the inline profile and under the parallel orientation.<i>Significance</i>. This work contributes to data availability on the correction or mitigation of the magnetic field-induced changes in the detectors' response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2024-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad6ed7
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relative profile measurements in 1.5T MR-linacs: investigation of central axis deviations

Vasiliki Margaroni, Nikolas Marinos, Eleftherios P. Pappas, Anastasios Episkopakis et al.
5 citations
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
2.02
article

Relative profile measurements in 1.5T MR-linacs: investigation of central axis deviations

Vasiliki Margaroni, Nikolas Marinos, Eleftherios P. Pappas, Anastasios Episkopakis, P. Karaiskos, Efi Koutsouveli
article en
5 citations

Abstract

<i>Objective</i>. In 1.5 T MR-linacs, the absorbed dose central axis (CAX) deviates from the beam's CAX due to inherent profile asymmetry. In addition, a measured CAX deviation may be biased due to potential lateral (to the beam) effective point of measurement (EPOML) shifts of the detector employed. By investigating CAX deviations, the scope of this study is to determine a set ofEPOMLshifts for profile measurements in 1.5 T MR-linacs.<i>Approach</i>. The Semiflex 3D ion chamber and microDiamond detector (PTW, Germany) were considered in the experimental study while three more detectors were included in the Monte Carlo (MC) study. CAX deviations in the crossline and inline profiles were calculated based on inflection points of the 10×10 cm<sup>2</sup>field, at five centers. In MC simulations, the experimental setup was reproduced. A small water voxel was simulated to calculate CAX deviation without the impact of the detector-specificEPOMLshift.<i>Main results</i>. All measurements were consistent among the five centers. MC-based and experimental measurements were in agreement within uncertainties. Placing the microDiamond in the vertical orientation does not appear to affect the detector'sEPOML, which is on its central longitudinal axis. For the Semiflex 3D in the crossline direction, the CAX deviation was 2.3 mm, i.e. 1 mm larger than the ones measured using the microDiamond and simulated considering the ideal water detector. Thus, anEPOMLshift of 1 mm is recommended for crossline profile measurements under both Semiflex 3D orientations. For the inline profile, anEPOMLshift of -0.5 mm was determined only for the parallel configuration. In the MC study, CAX deviations were found detector- and orientation-dependent. The dead volume is responsible for theEPOMLshift only in the inline profile and under the parallel orientation.<i>Significance</i>. This work contributes to data availability on the correction or mitigation of the magnetic field-induced changes in the detectors' response.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 69(17)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Hygeia Hospital (GR), Elekta (United Kingdom) (GB)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.