Identifying areas where biodiversity is at risk from potential cocoa expansion in the Congo Basin

The growing global demand for cocoa is leading to large-scale land-use changes and habitat loss in biodiversity rich areas such as the tropical lowland forests of Africa. Low productivity and climate change are projected to affect cocoa production in major parts of West Africa, where most of the world’s cocoa is produced. Such effects are expected to drive expansion into Central Africa where governments are looking towards commodity crop production, including cocoa, to support economic development objectives. For example, Cameroon is the fifth largest cocoa producer in the world and aims to triple its cocoa production volume by 2030. A tripling in yields is unlikely, especially within that timeframe, meaning this will only be possible through expansion. In conflict with this trajectory is new legislation in the UK and the EU, banning the import of commodities linked to deforestation. Cocoa is the fastest expanding export crop in Sub-Saharan Africa, but little is known about potential expansion areas in the Congo Basin and how this will impact biodiversity. In this study, we attempt to address this gap by answering two questions: (i) Where are available suitable areas to grow cocoa in the Congo Basin? (ii) Where are the likely impacts of cocoa expansion on biodiversity? We followed a spatial exclusionary approach to identify available areas for cocoa cultivation within areas with moderate to high climatic suitability for cocoa. This was achieved by identifying and excluding land-use and land cover types that are unsuitable for cocoa expansion under different assumptions. We then identified areas of high risk within the available area for cocoa as those with high cocoa suitability and high biodiversity significance (i.e., rarity-weighted species richness) and high accessibility. The study highlights the Congo Basin's central belt as an area where biodiversity would be put at high risk from cocoa expansion. Even with an effective no deforestation policy, biodiversity loss remains a concern in agricultural areas like western Cameroon and the northeastern and eastern edges of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. This research provides valuable insights that can be used to guide the development of strategies that mitigate the adverse effects of cocoa expansion on biodiversity. • Low productivity will likely push cocoa expansion from West to Central Africa. • We identified potential cocoa expansion and consequent biodiversity risk areas. • The Congo Basin’s central regions show high potential biodiversity risk. • Zero deforestation cocoa will not avoid biodiversity loss outside forests. • Our findings could help prioritise strategies to reduce biodiversity impacts from cocoa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Published
2024-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2024.109216
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.97

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying areas where biodiversity is at risk from potential cocoa expansion in the Congo Basin

Marieke Sassen, Arnout van Soesbergen, Christian Bunn, Vignesh Kamath et al.
15 citations
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
12.97
article

Identifying areas where biodiversity is at risk from potential cocoa expansion in the Congo Basin

Marieke Sassen, Arnout van Soesbergen, Christian Bunn, Vignesh Kamath, Andy Arnell
article en
15 citations

Abstract

The growing global demand for cocoa is leading to large-scale land-use changes and habitat loss in biodiversity rich areas such as the tropical lowland forests of Africa. Low productivity and climate change are projected to affect cocoa production in major parts of West Africa, where most of the world’s cocoa is produced. Such effects are expected to drive expansion into Central Africa where governments are looking towards commodity crop production, including cocoa, to support economic development objectives. For example, Cameroon is the fifth largest cocoa producer in the world and aims to triple its cocoa production volume by 2030. A tripling in yields is unlikely, especially within that timeframe, meaning this will only be possible through expansion. In conflict with this trajectory is new legislation in the UK and the EU, banning the import of commodities linked to deforestation. Cocoa is the fastest expanding export crop in Sub-Saharan Africa, but little is known about potential expansion areas in the Congo Basin and how this will impact biodiversity. In this study, we attempt to address this gap by answering two questions: (i) Where are available suitable areas to grow cocoa in the Congo Basin? (ii) Where are the likely impacts of cocoa expansion on biodiversity? We followed a spatial exclusionary approach to identify available areas for cocoa cultivation within areas with moderate to high climatic suitability for cocoa. This was achieved by identifying and excluding land-use and land cover types that are unsuitable for cocoa expansion under different assumptions. We then identified areas of high risk within the available area for cocoa as those with high cocoa suitability and high biodiversity significance (i.e., rarity-weighted species richness) and high accessibility. The study highlights the Congo Basin's central belt as an area where biodiversity would be put at high risk from cocoa expansion. Even with an effective no deforestation policy, biodiversity loss remains a concern in agricultural areas like western Cameroon and the northeastern and eastern edges of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. This research provides valuable insights that can be used to guide the development of strategies that mitigate the adverse effects of cocoa expansion on biodiversity. • Low productivity will likely push cocoa expansion from West to Central Africa. • We identified potential cocoa expansion and consequent biodiversity risk areas. • The Congo Basin’s central regions show high potential biodiversity risk. • Zero deforestation cocoa will not avoid biodiversity loss outside forests. • Our findings could help prioritise strategies to reduce biodiversity impacts from cocoa.

Agriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentVol. 376
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT), UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (GB), King's College London (GB), International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CO)
Biodiversa+, Direktoratet for Utviklingssamarbeid
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
12.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.