Evaluating the tangible and intangible parameters of cultural heritage: an economic meta-analysis in a global context

Sustainable development ensures the longevity of civilization by balancing economic growth, environmental protection, and social equity. The present study evaluates cultural heritage assets via a meta-regression analysis function transfer, in which 85 studies were examined that revealed 106 different willingness-to-pay (WTP) values in the period 1995–2022. The meta-regression methodology enables the valuation of cultural heritage—tangible and intangible—goods and services, as well as cultural values (e.g. aesthetic, spiritual, symbolic, etc.). The utilization of WTP would enable us to compare the two models (i.e., European and non-European) on how much a citizen would value cultural heritage based on non-market valuation. The results would inform policymakers about the importance of cultural heritage assets in the sustainable development agenda. The empirical findings present that the WTP for the European sample is 37.6€ and for the non-European is 60.12€. In essence, the Europeans are influenced mainly by intangible cultural assets, whereas non-Europeans are influenced by oral tradition. Overall, cultural heritage conservation necessitates for proper economic valuation through a holistic approach, in short—the valuation of both tangible and intangible cultural goods and services is imperative for sustainable development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Sustainability
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00398-w
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Conservation Techniques and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the tangible and intangible parameters of cultural heritage: an economic meta-analysis in a global context

George Halkos, Angelos Plataniotis, Phoebe Koundouri, Panagiotis‐Stavros C. Aslanidis
13 citations
Discover Sustainability
Conservation Techniques and Studies
25.42
article

Evaluating the tangible and intangible parameters of cultural heritage: an economic meta-analysis in a global context

George Halkos, Angelos Plataniotis, Phoebe Koundouri, Panagiotis‐Stavros C. Aslanidis
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Sustainable development ensures the longevity of civilization by balancing economic growth, environmental protection, and social equity. The present study evaluates cultural heritage assets via a meta-regression analysis function transfer, in which 85 studies were examined that revealed 106 different willingness-to-pay (WTP) values in the period 1995–2022. The meta-regression methodology enables the valuation of cultural heritage—tangible and intangible—goods and services, as well as cultural values (e.g. aesthetic, spiritual, symbolic, etc.). The utilization of WTP would enable us to compare the two models (i.e., European and non-European) on how much a citizen would value cultural heritage based on non-market valuation. The results would inform policymakers about the importance of cultural heritage assets in the sustainable development agenda. The empirical findings present that the WTP for the European sample is 37.6€ and for the non-European is 60.12€. In essence, the Europeans are influenced mainly by intangible cultural assets, whereas non-Europeans are influenced by oral tradition. Overall, cultural heritage conservation necessitates for proper economic valuation through a holistic approach, in short—the valuation of both tangible and intangible cultural goods and services is imperative for sustainable development.

Discover SustainabilityVol. 5(1)
University of Thessaly (GR), Athena Research and Innovation Center In Information Communication & Knowledge Technologies (GR), Athens University of Economics and Business (GR), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
European Commission, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Conservation Techniques and Studies
25.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.