Biologics in T2 Severe Asthma: Unveiling Different Effectiveness by Real-World Indirect Comparison

<b>Background</b>: Indirect comparison among biologics in severe asthma (SA) is a challenging but desirable goal for clinicians in real life. The aim of the study is to define characteristics of a biologic-treated T2-driven-SA population and to evaluate the effectiveness of biologic treatments in a real-world setting by variation in intra/inter-biologic parameters in an up to 4-year follow-up. <b>Methods</b>: Demographic, clinical, functional, and biological characteristics were evaluated retrospectively in 104 patients recruited until July 2022 at baseline (T0) and over a maximum of 4 years (T4) of biologic therapy (omalizumab/OmaG = 41, from T0 to T4, mepolizumab/MepoG = 26, from T0 to T4, benralizumab/BenraG = 18, from T0 to T2, and dupilumab/DupiG = 19, from T0 to T1). Variations of parameters using means of paired Delta were assessed. <b>Results</b>: At baseline, patients had high prevalence of T2-driven comorbidities, low asthma control test (ACT mean 17.65 ± 4.41), impaired pulmonary function (FEV<sub>1</sub> 65 ± 18 %pred), frequent exacerbations/year (AEs 3.5 ± 3), and OCS dependence (60%). DupiG had lower T2 biomarkers/comorbidities and AEs, and worse FEV<sub>1</sub> (57 ± 19 %pred) compared to other biologics (<i>p</i> < 0.05). All biologics improved ACT, FEV<sub>1</sub>%, FVC%, AEs rate, and OCS use. FEV<sub>1</sub>% improved in MepoG and BenraG over the minimal clinically important difference and was sustained over 4 years in OmaG and MepoG. A significant RV reduction in OmaG (T4) and DupiG (T1), and BenraG normalization (T2) of airflow limitation were found. We observed through inter-biologic parameters pair delta variation comparison a significant nocturnal awakenings reduction in BenraG vs. OmaG/MepoG, and neutrophils reduction in BenraG/DupiG vs. OmaG. <b>Conclusions</b>: Indirect comparison among biologics unveils clinical and functional improvements that may mark a different effectiveness. These results may highlight the preference of a single biologic compared to another with regard to specific treatable traits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164750
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biologics in T2 Severe Asthma: Unveiling Different Effectiveness by Real-World Indirect Comparison

Mattia Brusamento, Vitina Carriero, Elisa Arrigo, Stefano Pizzimenti et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Asthma and respiratory diseases
0.33
article

Biologics in T2 Severe Asthma: Unveiling Different Effectiveness by Real-World Indirect Comparison

Mattia Brusamento, Vitina Carriero, Elisa Arrigo, Stefano Pizzimenti, Sonia Garino, Fabio Luigi Massimo Ricciardolo, Giuseppe Guida, Stefano Levra, Fabiana Giannoccaro, Francesca Bertolini, Elisa Riccardi, Erica Falzone
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Indirect comparison among biologics in severe asthma (SA) is a challenging but desirable goal for clinicians in real life. The aim of the study is to define characteristics of a biologic-treated T2-driven-SA population and to evaluate the effectiveness of biologic treatments in a real-world setting by variation in intra/inter-biologic parameters in an up to 4-year follow-up. <b>Methods</b>: Demographic, clinical, functional, and biological characteristics were evaluated retrospectively in 104 patients recruited until July 2022 at baseline (T0) and over a maximum of 4 years (T4) of biologic therapy (omalizumab/OmaG = 41, from T0 to T4, mepolizumab/MepoG = 26, from T0 to T4, benralizumab/BenraG = 18, from T0 to T2, and dupilumab/DupiG = 19, from T0 to T1). Variations of parameters using means of paired Delta were assessed. <b>Results</b>: At baseline, patients had high prevalence of T2-driven comorbidities, low asthma control test (ACT mean 17.65 ± 4.41), impaired pulmonary function (FEV<sub>1</sub> 65 ± 18 %pred), frequent exacerbations/year (AEs 3.5 ± 3), and OCS dependence (60%). DupiG had lower T2 biomarkers/comorbidities and AEs, and worse FEV<sub>1</sub> (57 ± 19 %pred) compared to other biologics (<i>p</i> < 0.05). All biologics improved ACT, FEV<sub>1</sub>%, FVC%, AEs rate, and OCS use. FEV<sub>1</sub>% improved in MepoG and BenraG over the minimal clinically important difference and was sustained over 4 years in OmaG and MepoG. A significant RV reduction in OmaG (T4) and DupiG (T1), and BenraG normalization (T2) of airflow limitation were found. We observed through inter-biologic parameters pair delta variation comparison a significant nocturnal awakenings reduction in BenraG vs. OmaG/MepoG, and neutrophils reduction in BenraG/DupiG vs. OmaG. <b>Conclusions</b>: Indirect comparison among biologics unveils clinical and functional improvements that may mark a different effectiveness. These results may highlight the preference of a single biologic compared to another with regard to specific treatable traits.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(16)
Istituto di Farmacologia Traslazionale (IT), National Research Council (IT), Ospedale San Luigi Gonzaga (IT), University of Turin (IT)
AstraZeneca, Sanofi
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.