“We Follow the Disinformation”: Conceptualizing and Analyzing Fact-Checking Cultures Across Countries

Democratic societies inherently depend on an informed citizenry. By shaping citizens' voting behavior, fostering political cynicism, and reducing trust in institutions, misinformation can pose significant challenges to individuals and societies. Against this backdrop, fact-checking initiatives aimed at verifying the accuracy of publicly disseminated (mis)information have flourished worldwide. However, existing research is disproportionately oriented toward the Global North, with a focus on the United States and the most influential organizations. Equally scarce are comparative studies. To address these shortcomings, this study introduces a <i>context-sensitive framework</i> for analyzing fact-checking cultures and illustrates its application in a <i>cross-national comparative design</i> by contrasting two countries from the Global South and North: Brazil and Germany. Using a mixed-methods design, we integrate computational, qualitative, and quantitative content analysis of 11 fact-checking organizations and 13,498 fact-checking articles over 11 years (2013-2023), alongside qualitative semistructured interviews with fact-checkers (<i>N</i> = 10). Our findings reveal several areas of divergence and convergence, suggesting that fact-checking cultures transcend organizational and national boundaries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Press/Politics
Published
2024-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612241270004
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“We Follow the Disinformation”: Conceptualizing and Analyzing Fact-Checking Cultures Across Countries

Jing Zeng, Daniela Mahl, Mike S. Schäfer, Thaiane Oliveira et al.
17 citations
The International Journal of Press/Politics
Misinformation and Its Impacts
19.24
article

“We Follow the Disinformation”: Conceptualizing and Analyzing Fact-Checking Cultures Across Countries

Jing Zeng, Daniela Mahl, Mike S. Schäfer, Thaiane Oliveira, Fernando Antonio Egert
article en
17 citations

Abstract

Democratic societies inherently depend on an informed citizenry. By shaping citizens' voting behavior, fostering political cynicism, and reducing trust in institutions, misinformation can pose significant challenges to individuals and societies. Against this backdrop, fact-checking initiatives aimed at verifying the accuracy of publicly disseminated (mis)information have flourished worldwide. However, existing research is disproportionately oriented toward the Global North, with a focus on the United States and the most influential organizations. Equally scarce are comparative studies. To address these shortcomings, this study introduces a <i>context-sensitive framework</i> for analyzing fact-checking cultures and illustrates its application in a <i>cross-national comparative design</i> by contrasting two countries from the Global South and North: Brazil and Germany. Using a mixed-methods design, we integrate computational, qualitative, and quantitative content analysis of 11 fact-checking organizations and 13,498 fact-checking articles over 11 years (2013-2023), alongside qualitative semistructured interviews with fact-checkers (<i>N</i> = 10). Our findings reveal several areas of divergence and convergence, suggesting that fact-checking cultures transcend organizational and national boundaries.

The International Journal of Press/PoliticsVol. 31(2)
Universidade Federal Fluminense (BR), University of Zurich (CH)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
19.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“We Follow the Disinformation”: Conceptualizing and Analyzing Fact-Checking Cultures Across Countries — Jing Zeng, Daniela Mahl, et al. · The International Journal of Press/Politics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS