Designing measures of complex collaborations with participatory, evidence-centered design

An increasingly popular form of collaboration involves forming partnerships among researchers, educators, and community members to improve or transform education systems through research inquiry. However, not all partnerships are successful. The field needs valid, reliable, and useful measures to help with assessing progress toward partnership goals. In this community case study, we present a participatory, mixed-methods approach for creating measures to assess the progress of education research-practice partnerships (RPPs). The case illustrates a novel approach to measurement design, driven by perspectives and feedback of over 300 members of 80 partnerships. As a result, the measures align with the values and practices of the very collaborations the measures were intended to assess.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2024.1210547
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Improvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing measures of complex collaborations with participatory, evidence-centered design

Stacey Sexton, Caitlin C. Farrell, Corinne Singleton, Paula Arce-­Trigatti et al.
2 citations
Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics
Educational Assessment and Improvement
2.10
article

Designing measures of complex collaborations with participatory, evidence-centered design

Stacey Sexton, Caitlin C. Farrell, Corinne Singleton, Paula Arce-­Trigatti, Alison Fox Resnick, Robbin Riedy, Erin Henrick, William R. Penuel, Kristina Stamatis, Sarah Wellberg, James Soland, Danny Schmidt
article en
2 citations

Abstract

An increasingly popular form of collaboration involves forming partnerships among researchers, educators, and community members to improve or transform education systems through research inquiry. However, not all partnerships are successful. The field needs valid, reliable, and useful measures to help with assessing progress toward partnership goals. In this community case study, we present a participatory, mixed-methods approach for creating measures to assess the progress of education research-practice partnerships (RPPs). The case illustrates a novel approach to measurement design, driven by perspectives and feedback of over 300 members of 80 partnerships. As a result, the measures align with the values and practices of the very collaborations the measures were intended to assess.

Frontiers in Research Metrics and AnalyticsVol. 9
University of Nebraska at Omaha (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), University of Virginia (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Educational Assessment and Improvement
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Designing measures of complex collaborations with participatory, evidence-centered design — Stacey Sexton, Caitlin C. Farrell, et al. · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS