Immediate single‐tooth implant placement in bony defect sites: A 10‐year randomized controlled trial

Immediate implant placement in case of a failing tooth is a favorable treatment option for patients because it considerably shortens treatment time and the number of surgical treatments. The question is if an intact buccal bone wall is necessary for immediate implant placement. A 10-year study was performed in which 20 patients with a failing tooth in the frontal region of the upper jaw were treated with immediate implant placement and were compared with 20 patients in whom a more conventional treatment strategy was followed in which the failing tooth was first removed and the bone gap restored and the implant placed in a second step. After a 10-year follow-up period, it appeared that the bone around the implant was very stable, gums were healthy, and patients were very satisfied with the result. There was no difference between the two treatment procedures. Such results mean that professionals can discuss the procedure with the patient and apply the individual's preference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Periodontology
Published
2024-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.24-0251
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immediate single‐tooth implant placement in bony defect sites: A 10‐year randomized controlled trial

Henny J. A. Meijer, Barzi Gareb, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Kirsten W. Slagter et al.
12 citations
Journal of Periodontology
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
5.92
article

Immediate single‐tooth implant placement in bony defect sites: A 10‐year randomized controlled trial

Henny J. A. Meijer, Barzi Gareb, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Kirsten W. Slagter, Diederik F. M. Hentenaar, Arjan Vissink
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Immediate implant placement in case of a failing tooth is a favorable treatment option for patients because it considerably shortens treatment time and the number of surgical treatments. The question is if an intact buccal bone wall is necessary for immediate implant placement. A 10-year study was performed in which 20 patients with a failing tooth in the frontal region of the upper jaw were treated with immediate implant placement and were compared with 20 patients in whom a more conventional treatment strategy was followed in which the failing tooth was first removed and the bone gap restored and the implant placed in a second step. After a 10-year follow-up period, it appeared that the bone around the implant was very stable, gums were healthy, and patients were very satisfied with the result. There was no difference between the two treatment procedures. Such results mean that professionals can discuss the procedure with the patient and apply the individual's preference.

Journal of PeriodontologyVol. 96(2)
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Groningen (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
5.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.