Harnessing AI for Educational Measurement: Standards and Emerging Frontiers

The surge of AI in education raises concerns about measurement downsides. Calls for clear standards are warranted. Fortunately, the psychometrics field has a long history of developing relevant standards—like sample invariance and item bias avoidance—crucial for reliable, valid, and interpretable assessments. This established body of knowledge, not unlike traffic laws for self-driving cars, should guide AI assessment development. Measuring new constructs necessitates stronger construct validity research. Instead of rewriting the rulebook, our focus should be on educating AI developers about these standards. This commentary specifically addresses the concern of empowering instructors not with high-stakes testing but with effective item writing through AI. We explore the potential of AI to transform item development, a key area highlighted by researchers. While AI tools offer exciting possibilities for tackling educational challenges, equipping instructors to leverage them effectively remains paramount.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
Published
2024-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986241264033
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Harnessing AI for Educational Measurement: Standards and Emerging Frontiers

Hua‐Hua Chang
3 citations
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
Online Learning and Analytics
1.24
article

Harnessing AI for Educational Measurement: Standards and Emerging Frontiers

Hua‐Hua Chang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The surge of AI in education raises concerns about measurement downsides. Calls for clear standards are warranted. Fortunately, the psychometrics field has a long history of developing relevant standards—like sample invariance and item bias avoidance—crucial for reliable, valid, and interpretable assessments. This established body of knowledge, not unlike traffic laws for self-driving cars, should guide AI assessment development. Measuring new constructs necessitates stronger construct validity research. Instead of rewriting the rulebook, our focus should be on educating AI developers about these standards. This commentary specifically addresses the concern of empowering instructors not with high-stakes testing but with effective item writing through AI. We explore the potential of AI to transform item development, a key area highlighted by researchers. While AI tools offer exciting possibilities for tackling educational challenges, equipping instructors to leverage them effectively remains paramount.

Journal of Educational and Behavioral StatisticsVol. 49(5)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Online Learning and Analytics
1.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Harnessing AI for Educational Measurement: Standards and Emerging Frontiers — Hua‐Hua Chang · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS