Treatment strategies for cervical spondylotic myelopathy—is laminectomy alone a safe and effective option?

Background: Cervical laminectomy may be underutilized in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) due to concerns regarding potential for post-operative instability and/or kyphosis. The purpose of this retrospective, observational study is to assess the short-term clinical and radiological outcomes as well as complications associated with a group of carefully selected patients who underwent laminectomy alone for CSM and compared them to a cohort of patients who underwent laminectomy with fusion. Methods: Patients with CSM were identified via review of a single surgeon’s cases. All patients underwent preoperative clinical evaluation, lateral flexion-extension cervical radiographs, and documentation of neck and/or extremity pain via Nurick Scale and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores. Postoperative follow-up occurred at 1, 3 and 6 months for all patients. Statistical analysis was performed via Student’s t-test for parametric values and Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) rank sum test for ordinal scores. Multi-variable linear regression was used to correct for co-variance. Results: Forty-one patients who underwent laminectomy alone and 13 patients who underwent laminectomy with fusion were identified who met inclusion criteria. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement on Nurick and JOA scores postoperatively. Two patients in the laminectomy alone group required a subsequent one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for onset of postoperative neck pain, without neurological symptoms or new deficits in the follow up period. There was no difference in rates of post-operative kyphosis between the groups. Conclusions: In appropriately selected patients without pre-operative kyphosis or abnormal motion on flexion-extension films, cervical laminectomy remains a safe and effective treatment option.