How to extend pilot innovation in public services: A case of children's social care innovation

Abstract There is considerable investment by government policymakers in supporting pilot innovation in public services, following which pilots prove difficult to sustain. Our 4‐year longitudinal study of three pilot innovations in England, which seek to support the transition of care leavers into adulthood, provides insight into how such pilots can be sustained. Conceiving innovation as a journey, our study first identifies the dynamics of innovation around five key ingredients: the role of senior managers in cultivating a receptive context for innovation, distributed leadership, user co‐production, measurement of outcomes, and innovation adaption. Second, our study highlights some ingredients are more important as implementation of innovation is initiated and may fade in importance as the innovation journey proceeds. Third, our study shows innovation ingredients are shaped by organizational contingencies of performance and financial pressures. Finally, we suggest a need for a contextualized implementation science framework to examine innovation in social care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.13028
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to extend pilot innovation in public services: A case of children's social care innovation

Amy Lynch, Carrie Harrop, Gary Kerridge, Deborah Smart et al.
6 citations
Public Administration
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
4.39
article

How to extend pilot innovation in public services: A case of children's social care innovation

Amy Lynch, Carrie Harrop, Gary Kerridge, Deborah Smart, Emily R. Munro, Hayley Alderson, Ruth McGovern, Graeme Currie, Seana Friel, Rebecca Johnson, Jacky Swan
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract There is considerable investment by government policymakers in supporting pilot innovation in public services, following which pilots prove difficult to sustain. Our 4‐year longitudinal study of three pilot innovations in England, which seek to support the transition of care leavers into adulthood, provides insight into how such pilots can be sustained. Conceiving innovation as a journey, our study first identifies the dynamics of innovation around five key ingredients: the role of senior managers in cultivating a receptive context for innovation, distributed leadership, user co‐production, measurement of outcomes, and innovation adaption. Second, our study highlights some ingredients are more important as implementation of innovation is initiated and may fade in importance as the innovation journey proceeds. Third, our study shows innovation ingredients are shaped by organizational contingencies of performance and financial pressures. Finally, we suggest a need for a contextualized implementation science framework to examine innovation in social care.

Public AdministrationVol. 103(2)
Loughborough University (GB), University of Bedfordshire (GB), University of Warwick (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
4.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How to extend pilot innovation in public services: A case of children's social care innovation — Amy Lynch, Carrie Harrop, et al. · Public Administration (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS