Not Right Now: Factors Affecting Interruption Decisions in a Healthcare Paradigm

Interruptions that occur during high-stakes tasks in healthcare increase the likelihood of adverse events. Research on interruption management strategies has addressed the outcomes of interruptions but not what influences the decision to accept or reject them. This study examined the effects of high and low levels of three moderators on the interruption decision-making process: priority, cost of the interruption, and method of interruption. Participants entered data in a simulated patient chart while monitoring simulated patient vital signs and were interrupted four times to perform other activities. Participants could either accept or reject each interruption. The results showed that high priority, low-cost, and face-to-face interruptions were more likely to be accepted. Thus, participants considered the nature of the interrupting task when deciding to suspend work on their current task. These results suggest that a better understanding of factors that affect interruption decisions can lay a foundation to help diminish their disruptiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241262995
Primary Topic
Personal Information Management and User Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not Right Now: Factors Affecting Interruption Decisions in a Healthcare Paradigm

Rachel Ball, Mark W. Scerbo, Matthew Pacailler, Ballie Hirst
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Personal Information Management and User Behavior
article

Not Right Now: Factors Affecting Interruption Decisions in a Healthcare Paradigm

Rachel Ball, Mark W. Scerbo, Matthew Pacailler, Ballie Hirst
article en

Abstract

Interruptions that occur during high-stakes tasks in healthcare increase the likelihood of adverse events. Research on interruption management strategies has addressed the outcomes of interruptions but not what influences the decision to accept or reject them. This study examined the effects of high and low levels of three moderators on the interruption decision-making process: priority, cost of the interruption, and method of interruption. Participants entered data in a simulated patient chart while monitoring simulated patient vital signs and were interrupted four times to perform other activities. Participants could either accept or reject each interruption. The results showed that high priority, low-cost, and face-to-face interruptions were more likely to be accepted. Thus, participants considered the nature of the interrupting task when deciding to suspend work on their current task. These results suggest that a better understanding of factors that affect interruption decisions can lay a foundation to help diminish their disruptiveness.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 68(1)
Old Dominion University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Personal Information Management and User Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Not Right Now: Factors Affecting Interruption Decisions in a Healthcare Paradigm — Rachel Ball, Mark W. Scerbo, et al. · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS