An international observational study assessing conservative management in hemorrhoidal disease: results of CHORALIS (aCute HemORrhoidal disease evALuation International Study)

<b>Aim:</b> Real-world evidence on the management of hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is limited. This international study collected clinical practice data on the effectiveness of conservative treatments for acute HD on symptoms and quality of life (QoL), providing perspectives of treatment modalities from different continents. <b>Patients & methods:</b> The 4-week observational prospective CHORALIS study involved adult outpatients consulting for spontaneous complaints of hemorrhoids (graded using Goligher classification) and prescribed conservative treatments according to usual clinical practice. Assessments were: anal pain/discomfort (visual analog scale [VAS]), other signs/symptoms (patient questionnaire), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) questionnaire and disease-specific QoL (HEMO-FISS-QoL questionnaire). <b>Results:</b> Of 3592 participants, 3505 were analyzed (58.4% male; age 40.5 ± 13.7 years; history of HD in 48.4%; 72.1% Goligher grade I and II). Pain and discomfort were the most common symptoms. Most treatments were venoactive drugs (VADs; 90.9%), particularly micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF; 73.7%) and diosmin (14.6%). All VAD-based therapies improved signs/symptoms (number/intensity/frequency of pain, discomfort, bleeding, swelling, itching and soiling) and QoL. MPFF was associated with a significantly greater proportion of patients with no symptoms (48.8 vs diosmin 34.4%, p < 0.001), pain disappearance (69.7 vs diosmin 52.8%, p < 0.001), treatment impact at 1 week rated on PGI-C as 'very much better' (30.5 vs diosmin 17.9%, p < 0.001) and shorter times to improvement (mean ± SD 3.9 ± 1.5 days vs diosmin 4.2 ± 1.7 days). <b>Conclusion:</b> In this prospective real-world study of patients with acute HD, conservative therapies consisting mainly of VADs, including MPFF, improved the clinical signs and symptoms of disease, as well as QoL. This study evidence supports clinical advantages associated with VADs, mostly MPFF, for effectively managing acute HD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2024-0070
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An international observational study assessing conservative management in hemorrhoidal disease: results of CHORALIS (aCute HemORrhoidal disease evALuation International Study)

Mykhailo Zakharash, Ibrahima Konaté, Elly Nyaim Opot, Yu. A. Shelygin et al.
5 citations
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
2.86
article

An international observational study assessing conservative management in hemorrhoidal disease: results of CHORALIS (aCute HemORrhoidal disease evALuation International Study)

Mykhailo Zakharash, Ibrahima Konaté, Elly Nyaim Opot, Yu. A. Shelygin, Zoltán Csiki, Ren Donglin, Philippe Godeberge, Vanessa Blanc‐Guillemaud, Joanna Chirol, Trung Tin Nguyen, Moses Momoh, Ashraf Amir
article en
5 citations

Abstract

<b>Aim:</b> Real-world evidence on the management of hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is limited. This international study collected clinical practice data on the effectiveness of conservative treatments for acute HD on symptoms and quality of life (QoL), providing perspectives of treatment modalities from different continents. <b>Patients & methods:</b> The 4-week observational prospective CHORALIS study involved adult outpatients consulting for spontaneous complaints of hemorrhoids (graded using Goligher classification) and prescribed conservative treatments according to usual clinical practice. Assessments were: anal pain/discomfort (visual analog scale [VAS]), other signs/symptoms (patient questionnaire), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) questionnaire and disease-specific QoL (HEMO-FISS-QoL questionnaire). <b>Results:</b> Of 3592 participants, 3505 were analyzed (58.4% male; age 40.5 ± 13.7 years; history of HD in 48.4%; 72.1% Goligher grade I and II). Pain and discomfort were the most common symptoms. Most treatments were venoactive drugs (VADs; 90.9%), particularly micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF; 73.7%) and diosmin (14.6%). All VAD-based therapies improved signs/symptoms (number/intensity/frequency of pain, discomfort, bleeding, swelling, itching and soiling) and QoL. MPFF was associated with a significantly greater proportion of patients with no symptoms (48.8 vs diosmin 34.4%, p < 0.001), pain disappearance (69.7 vs diosmin 52.8%, p < 0.001), treatment impact at 1 week rated on PGI-C as 'very much better' (30.5 vs diosmin 17.9%, p < 0.001) and shorter times to improvement (mean ± SD 3.9 ± 1.5 days vs diosmin 4.2 ± 1.7 days). <b>Conclusion:</b> In this prospective real-world study of patients with acute HD, conservative therapies consisting mainly of VADs, including MPFF, improved the clinical signs and symptoms of disease, as well as QoL. This study evidence supports clinical advantages associated with VADs, mostly MPFF, for effectively managing acute HD.

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness ResearchVol. 13(10)
Université Gaston Berger (SN), University of Nairobi (KE), University of Debrecen (HU), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Université Paris Cité (FR), Kenyatta National Hospital (KE), State Scientific Center of Coloproctology (RU), Institute Mutualiste Montsouris (FR), Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (CN), King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (SA), University Medical Center HCMC (VN), Servier (France) (FR), University of Benin (NG), Bogomolets National Medical University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.