Cover-source mismatch in steganalysis: systematic review

Operational steganalysis contends with a major problem referred to as the cover-source mismatch (CSM), which is essentially a difference in distribution caused by different parameters and settings over training and test data. Despite it being of fundamental importance in an operational context, the CSM problem is often overlooked in the literature. With the goal to increase the visibility of this problem and attract the interest of the community, the present paper proposes a systematic review of the literature. It summarizes gathered knowledge and major open questions over the last 20 years of active research on CSM: terminology, methods of measurement, known causes, and mitigation strategies. Over 100 papers exploring, mitigating, assessing, or discussing steganalysis under train-test mismatch were collected by sampling scholar databases, and tracing references, cited and generated. For image steganalysis, the literature provided enough evidence to quantify the impact of causes, and the effectiveness of mitigation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EURASIP Journal on Information Security
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13635-024-00171-6
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cover-source mismatch in steganalysis: systematic review

Rémi Cogranne, Martin Beneš, Antoine Mallet
8 citations
EURASIP Journal on Information Security
Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
1.99
article

Cover-source mismatch in steganalysis: systematic review

Rémi Cogranne, Martin Beneš, Antoine Mallet
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Operational steganalysis contends with a major problem referred to as the cover-source mismatch (CSM), which is essentially a difference in distribution caused by different parameters and settings over training and test data. Despite it being of fundamental importance in an operational context, the CSM problem is often overlooked in the literature. With the goal to increase the visibility of this problem and attract the interest of the community, the present paper proposes a systematic review of the literature. It summarizes gathered knowledge and major open questions over the last 20 years of active research on CSM: terminology, methods of measurement, known causes, and mitigation strategies. Over 100 papers exploring, mitigating, assessing, or discussing steganalysis under train-test mismatch were collected by sampling scholar databases, and tracing references, cited and generated. For image steganalysis, the literature provided enough evidence to quantify the impact of causes, and the effectiveness of mitigation strategies.

EURASIP Journal on Information SecurityVol. 2024(1)
Université de Technologie de Troyes (FR), Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Horizon 2020
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
1.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cover-source mismatch in steganalysis: systematic review — Rémi Cogranne, Martin Beneš, et al. · EURASIP Journal on Information Security (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS