(Un)usual advocacy coalitions in a multi-system setting: the case of hydrogen in Germany

Abstract Grand sustainability challenges span multiple sectors and fields of policymaking. Novel technologies that respond to these challenges may trigger the emergence of new policy subsystems at the intersection of established sectors. We develop a framework that addresses the complexities of ‘multi-system settings.’ Empirically, we explore belief and coalition formation in the nascent policy subsystem around hydrogen technologies in Germany, which emerges at the intersection of electricity, transport, heating, and industry and is characterised by a broad range of actors from different sectoral backgrounds. We find two coalitions: a rather unusual coalition of actors from industry, NGOs, and research institutes as well as an expectable coalition of gas and heat sector actors. Actors disagree over production, application, and import standards for hydrogen. However, there is widespread support for hydrogen and for a strong role of the state across almost all actors. We explain our findings by combining insights from the advocacy coalition framework and politics of transitions: Belief and coalition formation in a nascent subsystem are influenced by sectoral backgrounds of actors, technology characteristics, as well as trust and former contacts. Our study contributes to a better understanding of early stages of coalition formation in a multi-system setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Sciences
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-024-09536-7
Citations
21
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(Un)usual advocacy coalitions in a multi-system setting: the case of hydrogen in Germany

Meike Löhr, Nils Ohlendorf, Jochen Markard
21 citations
Policy Sciences
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
5.94
article

(Un)usual advocacy coalitions in a multi-system setting: the case of hydrogen in Germany

Meike Löhr, Nils Ohlendorf, Jochen Markard
article en
21 citations

Abstract

Abstract Grand sustainability challenges span multiple sectors and fields of policymaking. Novel technologies that respond to these challenges may trigger the emergence of new policy subsystems at the intersection of established sectors. We develop a framework that addresses the complexities of ‘multi-system settings.’ Empirically, we explore belief and coalition formation in the nascent policy subsystem around hydrogen technologies in Germany, which emerges at the intersection of electricity, transport, heating, and industry and is characterised by a broad range of actors from different sectoral backgrounds. We find two coalitions: a rather unusual coalition of actors from industry, NGOs, and research institutes as well as an expectable coalition of gas and heat sector actors. Actors disagree over production, application, and import standards for hydrogen. However, there is widespread support for hydrogen and for a strong role of the state across almost all actors. We explain our findings by combining insights from the advocacy coalition framework and politics of transitions: Belief and coalition formation in a nascent subsystem are influenced by sectoral backgrounds of actors, technology characteristics, as well as trust and former contacts. Our study contributes to a better understanding of early stages of coalition formation in a multi-system setting.

Policy SciencesVol. 57(3)
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE), ETH Zurich (CH), Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change (DE), Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH), ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH)
Høgskulen på Vestlandet, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Norges Forskningsråd, Bundesamt für Energie, Eidgenössische Anstalt für Wasserversorgung Abwasserreinigung und Gewässerschutz
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
5.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.