Guided wave-driven machine learning for damage classification with limited dataset in aluminum panel

The goal of this research study is to classify damages in an aluminum panel using ultrasonic-guided waves (UGWs). The study is carried out on the premise that only a limited dataset, consisting of only two receivers, is available. In the experimental phase, three distinct parts, that is, stainless steel masses, were located on the surface of the panel, assumed to be mapped into four triangular regions, to experimentally simulate the effects induced by circular artificial damage of varied sizes. UGW-driven damage classification was thus performed via machine learning. A data synthesis technique called conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) was used to generate 2000 samples (signals) for each of the 12 different malfunction scenarios (classes), based on the combination of damage region and size. Damage features were extracted using the wavelet time scattering technique, while the classification task was performed via a long short-term memory network with tuned hyperparameters. A validation procedure was executed to ensure that the classification network was not overfitted. Furthermore, two testing stages were performed to evaluate the designed framework. The designed framework was thus tested on the observations excluded from the training and validation phases, as well as on 10 additional novel experimental samples. The high accuracy and F1-score values of the validation and the two testing stages—97.7%, 98.5%, and 96.6%, respectively—attest to the generality of this methodology, which is neither underfitted nor overfitted. To further assess the robustness of the methodology, the cGAN was tested on a new sensor placement, demonstrating a consistent performance (95.3%) and confirming the framework applicability under different sensor configurations, showcasing potential extension to other classification problems featuring a limited dataset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Health Monitoring
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217241268394
Citations
22
Primary Topic
Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guided wave-driven machine learning for damage classification with limited dataset in aluminum panel

Donato Perfetto, Giuseppe Lamanna, Antonio Polverino, Nima Rezazadeh et al.
22 citations
Structural Health Monitoring
Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
5.92
article

Guided wave-driven machine learning for damage classification with limited dataset in aluminum panel

Donato Perfetto, Giuseppe Lamanna, Antonio Polverino, Nima Rezazadeh, Alessandro De Luca
article en
22 citations

Abstract

The goal of this research study is to classify damages in an aluminum panel using ultrasonic-guided waves (UGWs). The study is carried out on the premise that only a limited dataset, consisting of only two receivers, is available. In the experimental phase, three distinct parts, that is, stainless steel masses, were located on the surface of the panel, assumed to be mapped into four triangular regions, to experimentally simulate the effects induced by circular artificial damage of varied sizes. UGW-driven damage classification was thus performed via machine learning. A data synthesis technique called conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) was used to generate 2000 samples (signals) for each of the 12 different malfunction scenarios (classes), based on the combination of damage region and size. Damage features were extracted using the wavelet time scattering technique, while the classification task was performed via a long short-term memory network with tuned hyperparameters. A validation procedure was executed to ensure that the classification network was not overfitted. Furthermore, two testing stages were performed to evaluate the designed framework. The designed framework was thus tested on the observations excluded from the training and validation phases, as well as on 10 additional novel experimental samples. The high accuracy and F1-score values of the validation and the two testing stages—97.7%, 98.5%, and 96.6%, respectively—attest to the generality of this methodology, which is neither underfitted nor overfitted. To further assess the robustness of the methodology, the cGAN was tested on a new sensor placement, demonstrating a consistent performance (95.3%) and confirming the framework applicability under different sensor configurations, showcasing potential extension to other classification problems featuring a limited dataset.

Structural Health MonitoringVol. 24(5)
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
5.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.