Using a Critical FMEA Approach to Identify Equity-Related Failures in Usability Evaluations of Health Technologies

Design issues that affect the usability of health technologies for marginalized populations may lead to further exacerbating health inequity. To address this concern, we propose the use of failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) to systematically identify potential inequities that result from usability evaluation methods. This new application of FMEA grounds the traditional FMEA in critical theory and introduces two key concepts: the equity failure mode and reflexivity. To test our approach, we engaged 13 usability practitioners with expertise in healthcare in a series of four workshops. We found that when participants located themselves reflexively in their practice of usability evaluation, they were able to identify more nuanced equity failure modes. Through reflecting on our experience using this method, we aim to illustrate that the critical FMEA is a viable approach human factors practitioners and researchers can use to anticipate equity failure modes in design and evaluation methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241260389
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using a Critical FMEA Approach to Identify Equity-Related Failures in Usability Evaluations of Health Technologies

Enid N. H. Montague, Joseph A Cafazzo, D. Ruben Tjhie
3 citations
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Health Policy Implementation Science
2.55
article

Using a Critical FMEA Approach to Identify Equity-Related Failures in Usability Evaluations of Health Technologies

Enid N. H. Montague, Joseph A Cafazzo, D. Ruben Tjhie
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Design issues that affect the usability of health technologies for marginalized populations may lead to further exacerbating health inequity. To address this concern, we propose the use of failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) to systematically identify potential inequities that result from usability evaluation methods. This new application of FMEA grounds the traditional FMEA in critical theory and introduces two key concepts: the equity failure mode and reflexivity. To test our approach, we engaged 13 usability practitioners with expertise in healthcare in a series of four workshops. We found that when participants located themselves reflexively in their practice of usability evaluation, they were able to identify more nuanced equity failure modes. Through reflecting on our experience using this method, we aim to illustrate that the critical FMEA is a viable approach human factors practitioners and researchers can use to anticipate equity failure modes in design and evaluation methods.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 68(1)
University Health Network (CA), University of Toronto (CA)
University Health Network
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Health Policy Implementation Science
2.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Using a Critical FMEA Approach to Identify Equity-Related Failures in Usability Evaluations of Health Technologies — Enid N. H. Montague, Joseph A Cafazzo, et al. · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS