Where Do Users Look When Deciding If a Text Message is Safe or Malicious?

Phishing via SMS, or SMiShing, is a rapidly growing cyber threat that causes significant financial losses. While research on email phishing has explored user behavior, the understanding of human factors in SMiShing detection remains limited. This study bridges the gap by investigating how users visually evaluate real-world SMS message legitimacy using eye-tracking technology. We aim to identify which message components capture user attention (e.g., sender information, typos/grammatical errors, links) and assess if users focus sufficiently on established red flags associated with phishing attempts. This research contributes to more effective user-centric countermeasures against SMiShing attacks by informing the design of security interventions that consider user behavior and mobile device information limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241264204
Primary Topic
Spam and Phishing Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Where Do Users Look When Deciding If a Text Message is Safe or Malicious?

Jeremiah D. Still, Eleni Alexandra Katsarakes, Morgan E. Edwards
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Spam and Phishing Detection
article

Where Do Users Look When Deciding If a Text Message is Safe or Malicious?

Jeremiah D. Still, Eleni Alexandra Katsarakes, Morgan E. Edwards
article en

Abstract

Phishing via SMS, or SMiShing, is a rapidly growing cyber threat that causes significant financial losses. While research on email phishing has explored user behavior, the understanding of human factors in SMiShing detection remains limited. This study bridges the gap by investigating how users visually evaluate real-world SMS message legitimacy using eye-tracking technology. We aim to identify which message components capture user attention (e.g., sender information, typos/grammatical errors, links) and assess if users focus sufficiently on established red flags associated with phishing attempts. This research contributes to more effective user-centric countermeasures against SMiShing attacks by informing the design of security interventions that consider user behavior and mobile device information limitations.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 68(1)
Old Dominion University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Spam and Phishing Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.