A Comparative Evaluation of Three Diagnostic Assays for the Detection of Human Monkeypox

Accurate and early diagnosis of monkeypox virus (MPXV) is crucial for controlling epidemics and treating affected individuals promptly. This study aimed to assess the analytical and clinical performance of the Molecision<sup>TM</sup> Monkeypox Virus qPCR Assay, Biorain Monkeypox Virus ddPCR Assay, and MAGLUMI<sup>®</sup> Monkeypox Virus Ag (chemiluminescence immunoassay, CLIA) Assay. Additionally, it aimed to compare the clinical application of antigen and nucleic acid assays to offer insights into using commercial monkeypox assay kits. Specimens from 117 clinical patients, serial diluted virus cell culture supernatant, and artificially created positive samples were tested to evaluate the performance of these assay kits for MPXV diagnostics. The Biorain Monkeypox Virus ddPCR Assay had a limit of detection (LoD) of 3.89 CCID<sub>50</sub>/mL, while the Molecision<sup>TM</sup> Monkeypox Virus qPCR Assay had an LoD of 15.55 CCID<sub>50</sub>/mL. The MAGLUMI<sup>®</sup> Monkeypox Virus Ag (CLIA) Assay had an LoD of 0.500 pg/mL. The accuracy of the Molecision<sup>TM</sup> Monkeypox Virus qPCR Assay was comparable to the Biorain Monkeypox Virus ddPCR Assay, and the MAGLUMI<sup>®</sup> Monkeypox Virus Ag (CLIA) Assay demonstrated high sensitivity. The specificity of all three MPXV diagnostic assays for clinical specimens with potential cross-reacting substances was 100%. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the clinical application of monkeypox assays, supporting efforts to mitigate and control the spread of monkeypox.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Viruses
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/v16081286
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Evaluation of Three Diagnostic Assays for the Detection of Human Monkeypox

Wei Rao, Ying Lin, Qing Xu, Manyu Huang et al.
15 citations
Viruses
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
4.40
article

A Comparative Evaluation of Three Diagnostic Assays for the Detection of Human Monkeypox

Wei Rao, Ying Lin, Qing Xu, Manyu Huang, Jing Qu, Xiao Tan, Ziqiu Chen, Xiaomin Zhang, Kun Liu, You Li, Cheng Chen, Xiaolu Shi, Wanqing Wang, Bo Peng, Shiliang Guo, Yan Yang, Zhonggang Fang, Ting Wang
article en
15 citations

Abstract

Accurate and early diagnosis of monkeypox virus (MPXV) is crucial for controlling epidemics and treating affected individuals promptly. This study aimed to assess the analytical and clinical performance of the Molecision<sup>TM</sup> Monkeypox Virus qPCR Assay, Biorain Monkeypox Virus ddPCR Assay, and MAGLUMI<sup>®</sup> Monkeypox Virus Ag (chemiluminescence immunoassay, CLIA) Assay. Additionally, it aimed to compare the clinical application of antigen and nucleic acid assays to offer insights into using commercial monkeypox assay kits. Specimens from 117 clinical patients, serial diluted virus cell culture supernatant, and artificially created positive samples were tested to evaluate the performance of these assay kits for MPXV diagnostics. The Biorain Monkeypox Virus ddPCR Assay had a limit of detection (LoD) of 3.89 CCID<sub>50</sub>/mL, while the Molecision<sup>TM</sup> Monkeypox Virus qPCR Assay had an LoD of 15.55 CCID<sub>50</sub>/mL. The MAGLUMI<sup>®</sup> Monkeypox Virus Ag (CLIA) Assay had an LoD of 0.500 pg/mL. The accuracy of the Molecision<sup>TM</sup> Monkeypox Virus qPCR Assay was comparable to the Biorain Monkeypox Virus ddPCR Assay, and the MAGLUMI<sup>®</sup> Monkeypox Virus Ag (CLIA) Assay demonstrated high sensitivity. The specificity of all three MPXV diagnostic assays for clinical specimens with potential cross-reacting substances was 100%. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the clinical application of monkeypox assays, supporting efforts to mitigate and control the spread of monkeypox.

VirusesVol. 16(8)
Shenzhen Bioeasy Biotechnology (China) (CN), Shenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN), National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
4.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.