A novel cell-free multi-omics approach for enhancing multi-cancer early detection.

103 Background: While circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based assays for multi-cancer early detection (MCED) have shown significant potential, their performance is hindered by the limited amount and inherent variability of ctDNA, particularly in cancer types with low ctDNA shedding. To enhance the accuracy of MCED, recent studies have focused on profiling cell-free RNA (cfRNA), which is secreted not only by tumor cells but also by other cell types to reflect the systemic tumor responses. Herein, we developed a novel cell-free multi-omics approach integrating cfDNA and cfRNA analyses from a single blood draw to improve the sensitivity of an MCED assay, especially for detecting low-shedding ctDNA cancer types. Methods: We recruited 535 healthy subjects and 287 patients across five cancer types (77 breast cancers, 102 colorectal cancers, 35 gastric cancers, 34 liver cancers, and 42 lung cancers). We established a multi-omics workflow to comprehensively profile cfDNA signatures (methylation, fragment length, motif ends, and copy number alterations), and cfRNA signatures (cfmRNA). Distinctive signatures were identified to differentiate cancers from healthy subjects and used for constructing robust machine learning classifiers. Results: We identified multiple significantly different features distinguishing cancer from healthy individuals, with 81% originating from cfDNA. Notably, cfmRNA features, accounting for 19% of total significant features, were mainly enriched in immune-related pathways, reflecting tumor-immune cell interactions. The cfDNA-based model achieved 81.2% accuracy, with highest performance in detecting liver cancer (100%) and 64%, 42%, and 36.4% for breast, colorectal, and gastric cancers, respectively, at 93% specificity. Combining cfDNA and cfRNA signatures increased sensitivity to 73%, 71%, and 46% for breast, colorectal, and gastric cancers. Overall, the multi-omic model achieved 85.6% accuracy and 72.7% sensitivity for detecting five cancer types at 92.6% specificity. Conclusions: The cell-free multi-omics approach holds potential for improving ctDNA-based MCED tests by simultaneously profiling both cfDNA and transcriptomic cfmRNA from a single blood draw. Validation on larger cohorts could lead to a paradigm shift in cancer screening practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2024-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.23_suppl.103
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel cell-free multi-omics approach for enhancing multi-cancer early detection.

Hoai‐Nghia Nguyen, Le Son Tran, Trang Thi Tran, Trong Hieu Nguyen et al.
3 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
0.70
article

A novel cell-free multi-omics approach for enhancing multi-cancer early detection.

Hoai‐Nghia Nguyen, Le Son Tran, Trang Thi Tran, Trong Hieu Nguyen, Hoa Giang, Minh‐Duy Phan, Thien-Chi Van Nguyen, Thien‐Phuc Hoang Nguyen, Trung Hieu Tran, Tien Anh Nguyen, Hanh Thi-Hue Nguyen, Anh-Nhu Nguyen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

103 Background: While circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based assays for multi-cancer early detection (MCED) have shown significant potential, their performance is hindered by the limited amount and inherent variability of ctDNA, particularly in cancer types with low ctDNA shedding. To enhance the accuracy of MCED, recent studies have focused on profiling cell-free RNA (cfRNA), which is secreted not only by tumor cells but also by other cell types to reflect the systemic tumor responses. Herein, we developed a novel cell-free multi-omics approach integrating cfDNA and cfRNA analyses from a single blood draw to improve the sensitivity of an MCED assay, especially for detecting low-shedding ctDNA cancer types. Methods: We recruited 535 healthy subjects and 287 patients across five cancer types (77 breast cancers, 102 colorectal cancers, 35 gastric cancers, 34 liver cancers, and 42 lung cancers). We established a multi-omics workflow to comprehensively profile cfDNA signatures (methylation, fragment length, motif ends, and copy number alterations), and cfRNA signatures (cfmRNA). Distinctive signatures were identified to differentiate cancers from healthy subjects and used for constructing robust machine learning classifiers. Results: We identified multiple significantly different features distinguishing cancer from healthy individuals, with 81% originating from cfDNA. Notably, cfmRNA features, accounting for 19% of total significant features, were mainly enriched in immune-related pathways, reflecting tumor-immune cell interactions. The cfDNA-based model achieved 81.2% accuracy, with highest performance in detecting liver cancer (100%) and 64%, 42%, and 36.4% for breast, colorectal, and gastric cancers, respectively, at 93% specificity. Combining cfDNA and cfRNA signatures increased sensitivity to 73%, 71%, and 46% for breast, colorectal, and gastric cancers. Overall, the multi-omic model achieved 85.6% accuracy and 72.7% sensitivity for detecting five cancer types at 92.6% specificity. Conclusions: The cell-free multi-omics approach holds potential for improving ctDNA-based MCED tests by simultaneously profiling both cfDNA and transcriptomic cfmRNA from a single blood draw. Validation on larger cohorts could lead to a paradigm shift in cancer screening practices.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 42(23_suppl)
Agricultural Genetics Institute (VN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
0.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.