The candidate novel markers PIV and PILE score to predict survival outcomes and therapeutic response in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma.

24 Background: Recent studies highlighted the predictive value of easily measurable blood-based biomarkers, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). Recently, a novel comprehensive marker that represents the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) has been proposed as a more reliable predictor of clinical outcomes. We aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of PIV and PILE score (a score based on PIV, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS)), in patients with PCNSL. Methods: A total of 109 patients were enrolled. PIV was calculated as follows: (neutrophil count × platelet count × monocyte count)/lymphocyte count. The PILE score was calculated with the sum of individual values (for PIV < median = 0, ≥ median = 1; for LDH ≤ upper limit of normal (ULN) = 0, > ULN = 1; for ECOG PS < 2 = 0, ≥ 2 = 1). The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox hazards regression models were used for survival analyses. The relationship between PIV, PILE, and therapeutic response was examined. Results: Pretreatment high PIV was confirmed to be an independent significant factor for overall survival (OS) in univariate (HR 3.990, 95%CI 1.778-8.954, p < 0.001) and multivariate (HR 3.047, 95%CI 1.175-7.897, p = 0.022) analyses. Baseline PIV was also associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS). Regarding OS, PIV showed a better predictive performance than other widely used systemic inflammation parameters. Significantly shorter OS and PFS were observed in the high PILE group (median OS: 25.60, 95% CI 15.60-NR vs. NR months, 95% CI 26.10-NR, p = 0.008; median PFS: 26.13, 95% CI 23.30-NR vs. 7.13 months, 95% CI 4.87-NR, p < 0.001). High PILE was associated with primary resistance to therapy (high PILE group: 21/42 patients, 50.00%; low PILE group: 5/45 patients, 11.11%; p < 0.001). A significantly lower response rate to initial treatment was found in patients in the high PILE group (23/42, 54.76%) as compared to patients in the low PILE group (7/45, 15.56%; p < 0.001). PILE was independently associated with therapeutic response to initial treatment (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.05–0.46; p < 0.001). Conclusions: High PIV and high PILE were correlated with worse clinical outcomes in PCNSL patients, indicating that PIV and PILE might be a powerful predictor of prognosis and a potential predictive indicator for treatment response in PCNSL.