Safety analysis by treatment periods from EMERALD-1: A phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study of transarterial chemoembolization with durvalumab with/without bevacizumab in participants with embolization-eligible unresectable hepatocellular ca

65 Background: The global Phase 3 EMERALD-1 study (NCT03778957) primary endpoint was met: durvalumab (D) + bevacizumab (B) + transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) significantly improved progression-free survival vs placebos (pbos) + TACE (median 15.0 vs 8.2 mo; HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61–0.98; p=0.032 [threshold 0.0435]) in participants (pts) with embolization-eligible unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) with a manageable safety profile. This post hoc, exploratory analysis assessed safety in the study’s two treatment (tx) periods (pds): D-TACE (D-T) and D-B. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to D+TACE, D+B+TACE, or pbos+TACE. In the D-T pd, pts received 1–4 TACE (cTACE or DEB-TACE [investigator choice]) plus D (1500 mg Q4W) or pbo for D. In the D-B pd, post-last TACE, pts received D (1120 mg Q3W) plus pbo for B, D (1120 mg Q3W) plus B (15 mg/kg Q3W), or pbos for D and B. Adverse events (AEs), start/end date, maximum/change in CTCAE grade, and causality were assessed in the D-T and D-B pds in pts who received any study tx in the arm to which they were randomized, until end of follow-up. Results: The Table shows duration of exposure (DoE). In the D+TACE, D+B+TACE, and pbos+TACE arms, AEs were reported by 144 (74.6%), 139 (72.0%), and 148 (74.0%) pts in the D-T pd and 133 (68.9%), 147 (76.2%), and 132 (66.0%) pts in the D-B pd; were possibly related (pos rel) to study tx in 59 (30.6%), 56 (29.0%), and 41 (20.5%) pts in the D-T pd and 76 (39.4%), 114 (59.1%), and 69 (34.5%) pts in the D-B pd; and were provoked by TACE in 72 (37.3%), 90 (46.6%), and 85 (42.5%) pts in the D-T pd and 16 (8.3%), 18 (9.3%), and 21 (10.5%) pts in the D-B pd, respectively. Conclusions: D+B+TACE had a manageable safety profile across the D-T and D-B pds, consistent with the individual agents and underlying disease. These data further support D+B+TACE as a new potential standard of care in embolization-eligible uHCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03778957 . [Table: see text]

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2024-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.23_suppl.65
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety analysis by treatment periods from EMERALD-1: A phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study of transarterial chemoembolization with durvalumab with/without bevacizumab in participants with embolization-eligible unresectable hepatocellular ca

В. В. Бредер, Zhenggang Ren, Masatoshi Kudo, Jean‐Marie Péron et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
0.74
article

Safety analysis by treatment periods from EMERALD-1: A phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study of transarterial chemoembolization with durvalumab with/without bevacizumab in participants with embolization-eligible unresectable hepatocellular ca

В. В. Бредер, Zhenggang Ren, Masatoshi Kudo, Jean‐Marie Péron, Tien Quang Nguyen, Shukui Qin, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Stephen L. Chan, Riccardo Lencioni, Kerry Parsons, Yasuaki Arai, Anil Veluvolu, Bruno Sangro, Shi-Ming Lin, Claire Morgan, Chang-Fang Chiu, Ioannis Xynos, Satheesh Chiradoni Thungappa, Florinda Santos, Lünan Yan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

65 Background: The global Phase 3 EMERALD-1 study (NCT03778957) primary endpoint was met: durvalumab (D) + bevacizumab (B) + transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) significantly improved progression-free survival vs placebos (pbos) + TACE (median 15.0 vs 8.2 mo; HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61–0.98; p=0.032 [threshold 0.0435]) in participants (pts) with embolization-eligible unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) with a manageable safety profile. This post hoc, exploratory analysis assessed safety in the study’s two treatment (tx) periods (pds): D-TACE (D-T) and D-B. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to D+TACE, D+B+TACE, or pbos+TACE. In the D-T pd, pts received 1–4 TACE (cTACE or DEB-TACE [investigator choice]) plus D (1500 mg Q4W) or pbo for D. In the D-B pd, post-last TACE, pts received D (1120 mg Q3W) plus pbo for B, D (1120 mg Q3W) plus B (15 mg/kg Q3W), or pbos for D and B. Adverse events (AEs), start/end date, maximum/change in CTCAE grade, and causality were assessed in the D-T and D-B pds in pts who received any study tx in the arm to which they were randomized, until end of follow-up. Results: The Table shows duration of exposure (DoE). In the D+TACE, D+B+TACE, and pbos+TACE arms, AEs were reported by 144 (74.6%), 139 (72.0%), and 148 (74.0%) pts in the D-T pd and 133 (68.9%), 147 (76.2%), and 132 (66.0%) pts in the D-B pd; were possibly related (pos rel) to study tx in 59 (30.6%), 56 (29.0%), and 41 (20.5%) pts in the D-T pd and 76 (39.4%), 114 (59.1%), and 69 (34.5%) pts in the D-B pd; and were provoked by TACE in 72 (37.3%), 90 (46.6%), and 85 (42.5%) pts in the D-T pd and 16 (8.3%), 18 (9.3%), and 21 (10.5%) pts in the D-B pd, respectively. Conclusions: D+B+TACE had a manageable safety profile across the D-T and D-B pds, consistent with the individual agents and underlying disease. These data further support D+B+TACE as a new potential standard of care in embolization-eligible uHCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03778957 . [Table: see text]

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 42(23_suppl)
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Pisa (IT), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), China Medical University (TW), Sichuan University (CN), Fudan University (CN), Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command (CN), Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW), Willis-Knighton Cancer Center (US), West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN), Hospital de Câncer de Barretos (BR), Prince of Wales Hospital (CN), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (ES), Hôpital Rangueil (FR), China Medical University Hospital (TW), Zhongshan Hospital (CN), Jiangsu Cancer Hospital (CN), Clinica Universidad de Navarra (ES), National Medical Research Center of Cardiology (RU), AstraZeneca (United States) (US), Viet Duc Hospital (VN), National Patient Safety Foundation (US), Kindai University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
0.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.