Incorporating Patient Values in Large Language Model Recommendations for Surrogate and Proxy Decisions
Automated extractions of the treatment in question were accurate for 88% (n = 44/50) of scenarios. LLM treatment recommendations received an average Likert score by the adjudicators of 3.92 of 5.00 (five being best) across all patients for being medically plausible and reasonable treatment recommendations, and 3.58 of 5.00 for reflecting the documented values of the patient. Scores were highest when patient values were captured as short, unstructured, and free-text narratives based on simulated patient profiles. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the potential for LLMs to function as support tools for surrogates, proxies, and clinicians aiming to honor the wishes and values of decisionally incapacitated patients.
Authors
- Jeremy A. Balch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1826-7884)
- Naveen Baskaran
- Azra Bihorac (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5745-2863)
- Benjamin Shickel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5304-7027)
- Philip A. Efron (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3931-650X)
- Tyler John Loftus (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5354-443X)
- Victoria Nolan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6069-963X)
- Christopher J. Tignanelli
- Gilbert R. Upchurch
- Ray Moseley
Institutions
- University of Minnesota (US)
- University of Florida (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Critical Care Explorations
- Published
- 2024-08-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/cce.0000000000001131
- Citations
- 11
- Primary Topic
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 5.97