Illness uncertainty, coping, and quality of life in patients with advanced cancer and family caregivers: A dyadic study.

185 Background: Illness uncertainty is prevalent among patients with cancer and their family caregivers. While the relationship between illness uncertainty, coping, and quality of life (QOL) has been explored individually for patients or caregivers, it remains largely unexamined within patient-caregiver dyads. Guided by Mishel’s Uncertainty in Illness Theory, this study examined the relationships between illness uncertainty, coping, and QOL among patients with advanced cancer and family caregivers. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed the data from a randomized clinical trial that examined the effects of a dyadic-based intervention on psychological outcomes for patients with advanced cancer and family caregivers. Illness uncertainty, coping, and QOL were measured using the shorten version of the Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale for Adult, the Brief Cope, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, respectively. The actor-partner interdependence mediation model was used to achieve the aim. Results: This study included 484 patient-caregiver dyads, with patients diagnosed with advanced breast (32.4%), lung (29.1%), colorectal (25.4%), and prostate cancer (13.0%). Patients’ avoidant coping mediated the relationship between their own illness uncertainty and QOL ( p < .001). Caregivers’ active coping and avoidant coping mediated the relationship between their own illness uncertainty and QOL ( p < .001). Notably, caregivers’ illness uncertainty was positively associated with patients’ avoidant coping ( b = 0.113; p < .01). Conclusions: This study is one of the first to use a dyadic approach to investigate the relationships between illness uncertainty, coping, and QOL in advanced cancer patients and caregivers. Our findings highlight the importance of viewing patient-caregiver dyads as the unit of care. These findings support targeted interventions offered to both patients and family caregivers to manage their illness uncertainty and improve their QOL. Giving the effect of caregivers’ uncertainty on patients’ coping, healthcare professionals should advocate for additional psychosocial supports for family caregivers. Clinical trial information: NCT00709176 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2024-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.23_suppl.185
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Illness uncertainty, coping, and quality of life in patients with advanced cancer and family caregivers: A dyadic study.

Mimi V. Chapman, Catherine Zimmer, Lisa de Saxe Zerden, Laurel Northouse et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Illness uncertainty, coping, and quality of life in patients with advanced cancer and family caregivers: A dyadic study.

Mimi V. Chapman, Catherine Zimmer, Lisa de Saxe Zerden, Laurel Northouse, Lixin Song, Ting Guan
article en

Abstract

185 Background: Illness uncertainty is prevalent among patients with cancer and their family caregivers. While the relationship between illness uncertainty, coping, and quality of life (QOL) has been explored individually for patients or caregivers, it remains largely unexamined within patient-caregiver dyads. Guided by Mishel’s Uncertainty in Illness Theory, this study examined the relationships between illness uncertainty, coping, and QOL among patients with advanced cancer and family caregivers. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed the data from a randomized clinical trial that examined the effects of a dyadic-based intervention on psychological outcomes for patients with advanced cancer and family caregivers. Illness uncertainty, coping, and QOL were measured using the shorten version of the Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale for Adult, the Brief Cope, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, respectively. The actor-partner interdependence mediation model was used to achieve the aim. Results: This study included 484 patient-caregiver dyads, with patients diagnosed with advanced breast (32.4%), lung (29.1%), colorectal (25.4%), and prostate cancer (13.0%). Patients’ avoidant coping mediated the relationship between their own illness uncertainty and QOL ( p < .001). Caregivers’ active coping and avoidant coping mediated the relationship between their own illness uncertainty and QOL ( p < .001). Notably, caregivers’ illness uncertainty was positively associated with patients’ avoidant coping ( b = 0.113; p < .01). Conclusions: This study is one of the first to use a dyadic approach to investigate the relationships between illness uncertainty, coping, and QOL in advanced cancer patients and caregivers. Our findings highlight the importance of viewing patient-caregiver dyads as the unit of care. These findings support targeted interventions offered to both patients and family caregivers to manage their illness uncertainty and improve their QOL. Giving the effect of caregivers’ uncertainty on patients’ coping, healthcare professionals should advocate for additional psychosocial supports for family caregivers. Clinical trial information: NCT00709176 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 42(23_suppl)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), University of Michigan (US), Syracuse University (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.