Commercially‐produced infant and toddler foods—How healthy are they? An evaluation of products sold in Australian supermarkets

In response to the need for better guidance and regulation for commercially produced infant and toddler foods and beverages, the WHO Regional Office for Europe published a Nutrient and Promotion Profile Model (hereafter NPPM) in 2022. This study assessed the nutritional and promotional profile of infant and toddler foods (for ages 6-36 months) sold in Australian supermarkets in 2022 using the NPPM. The main types of claims used for product promotion were also examined and results were presented by category and by packaging type. Nutrient and claims data were extracted for commercially produced infant and toddler products from The George Institute's FoodSwitch database. Products were classified according to NPPM food categories and assessed against relevant nutritional and promotional requirements. Of the 309 products examined, 78% failed to meet the nutritional requirements of the NPPM, and 0% met the promotional requirements. Every product had at least one claim on-pack that was prohibited under the NPPM, with some products displaying up to 21 different claims on-pack. Pouches had the highest number of prohibited claims of all packaging types. Findings highlight that urgent work is needed to improve the nutritional quality of commercially produced infant and toddler foods in Australia. The high use of prohibited claims also suggests the need to regulate the type and number of claims that can be made on-pack, as parents and carers could easily be misled by the deceptive labelling that is currently allowed to be displayed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Maternal and Child Nutrition
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13709
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Commercially‐produced infant and toddler foods—How healthy are they? An evaluation of products sold in Australian supermarkets

Elizabeth Dunford, Maree Scully, Daisy H. Coyle
13 citations
Maternal and Child Nutrition
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
7.06
article

Commercially‐produced infant and toddler foods—How healthy are they? An evaluation of products sold in Australian supermarkets

Elizabeth Dunford, Maree Scully, Daisy H. Coyle
article en
13 citations

Abstract

In response to the need for better guidance and regulation for commercially produced infant and toddler foods and beverages, the WHO Regional Office for Europe published a Nutrient and Promotion Profile Model (hereafter NPPM) in 2022. This study assessed the nutritional and promotional profile of infant and toddler foods (for ages 6-36 months) sold in Australian supermarkets in 2022 using the NPPM. The main types of claims used for product promotion were also examined and results were presented by category and by packaging type. Nutrient and claims data were extracted for commercially produced infant and toddler products from The George Institute's FoodSwitch database. Products were classified according to NPPM food categories and assessed against relevant nutritional and promotional requirements. Of the 309 products examined, 78% failed to meet the nutritional requirements of the NPPM, and 0% met the promotional requirements. Every product had at least one claim on-pack that was prohibited under the NPPM, with some products displaying up to 21 different claims on-pack. Pouches had the highest number of prohibited claims of all packaging types. Findings highlight that urgent work is needed to improve the nutritional quality of commercially produced infant and toddler foods in Australia. The high use of prohibited claims also suggests the need to regulate the type and number of claims that can be made on-pack, as parents and carers could easily be misled by the deceptive labelling that is currently allowed to be displayed.

Maternal and Child NutritionVol. 20(4)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Cancer Council Victoria (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), The George Institute for Global Health (AU)
University of New South Wales
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
7.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.