Assessment of Missing Data on Glaucoma Severity Among Participants in the NIH All of Us Research Program of the United States

There were significant differences between glaucoma participants with glaucoma severity stage specified versus those with unstaged disease across multiple socioeconomic characteristics and self-reported barriers to care. Glaucoma severity staging data was not missing completely at random. The unstaged cohort included higher rates of multiple underrepresented communities, which may potentially contribute to bias in ophthalmology research as participants from vulnerable populations may be disproportionately excluded from electronic health records or claims data studies where diagnosis codes with severity/staging levels are used to examine risk factors for disease, progression, and treatment efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Glaucoma
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ijg.0000000000002480
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Missing Data on Glaucoma Severity Among Participants in the NIH All of Us Research Program of the United States

Bharanidharan Radha Saseendrakumar, Robert Neal Weinreb, Kaela Acuff, Sally L. Baxter
2 citations
Journal of Glaucoma
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
1.08
article

Assessment of Missing Data on Glaucoma Severity Among Participants in the NIH All of Us Research Program of the United States

Bharanidharan Radha Saseendrakumar, Robert Neal Weinreb, Kaela Acuff, Sally L. Baxter
article en
2 citations

Abstract

There were significant differences between glaucoma participants with glaucoma severity stage specified versus those with unstaged disease across multiple socioeconomic characteristics and self-reported barriers to care. Glaucoma severity staging data was not missing completely at random. The unstaged cohort included higher rates of multiple underrepresented communities, which may potentially contribute to bias in ophthalmology research as participants from vulnerable populations may be disproportionately excluded from electronic health records or claims data studies where diagnosis codes with severity/staging levels are used to examine risk factors for disease, progression, and treatment efficacy.

Journal of GlaucomaVol. 34(1)
University of San Diego (US), University of California San Diego (US)
Research to Prevent Blindness, National Institutes of Health
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
1.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessment of Missing Data on Glaucoma Severity Among Participants in the NIH All of Us Research Program of the United States — Bharanidharan Radha Saseendrakumar, Robert Neal Weinreb, et al. · Journal of Glaucoma (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS