Using Generative AI Systems for Critical Thinking Engagement in an Advanced Chemistry Course: A Case Study

A series of critical thinking assignments was created for students in an advanced chemistry course to interact with and evaluate generative AI (GenAI) systems. Students explored GenAI’s facility with producing summaries of C&EN articles, analyzing titration data, and closely reading literature articles. For each assignment, the students evaluated the output using a critical thinking exercise and presented their results using written reports. The students found GenAI to be effective at summarizing news articles, although it demonstrated inaccuracies in mathematical calculations and produced mixed results in answering technical questions based on specific literature articles. The assignments provided valuable practice for students’ critical thinking skills.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Education
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00242
Citations
22
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
46.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Generative AI Systems for Critical Thinking Engagement in an Advanced Chemistry Course: A Case Study

Laura E. Pence, Harry E. Pence, Alexander Pacheco Castillo, Mariama Mbow et al.
22 citations
Journal of Chemical Education
Education and Critical Thinking Development
46.11
article

Using Generative AI Systems for Critical Thinking Engagement in an Advanced Chemistry Course: A Case Study

Laura E. Pence, Harry E. Pence, Alexander Pacheco Castillo, Mariama Mbow, Sara Borner, Jackson T. Forlenza, Amelie Suero, Bridget Amoah, Greta L. Hightower, Kaden Leonard, Alexandra McLellan
article en
22 citations

Abstract

A series of critical thinking assignments was created for students in an advanced chemistry course to interact with and evaluate generative AI (GenAI) systems. Students explored GenAI’s facility with producing summaries of C&EN articles, analyzing titration data, and closely reading literature articles. For each assignment, the students evaluated the output using a critical thinking exercise and presented their results using written reports. The students found GenAI to be effective at summarizing news articles, although it demonstrated inaccuracies in mathematical calculations and produced mixed results in answering technical questions based on specific literature articles. The assignments provided valuable practice for students’ critical thinking skills.

Journal of Chemical EducationVol. 101(9)
SUNY Oneonta (US), University of Hartford (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
46.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Using Generative AI Systems for Critical Thinking Engagement in an Advanced Chemistry Course: A Case Study — Laura E. Pence, Harry E. Pence, et al. · Journal of Chemical Education (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS