IDDF2024-ABS-0166 Metabolomics-driven plasma and tissue signatures and machine learning for gastric cancer diagnosis: a retrospective study and mendelian randomization study

<h3>Background</h3> Gastric cancer (GC) is a highly prevalent and deadly malignancy, necessitating timely diagnosis and intervention. However, current diagnoses predominantly hinge on gastroscopy, limited by invasiveness and low uptake rates. We aimed to develop diagnostic models for GC utilizing non-invasive plasma metabolic biomarkers. <h3>Methods</h3> We conducted a two-phase study involving 647 participants, comprising 277 GC and 370 non-GC. Candidate differential metabolites were identified in the discovery and validation phases using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, and a diagnostic model was developed using machine-learning algorithms. Then, mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was used to examine the causal association between metabolic biomarkers and the risk of GC. These metabolic biomarkers were validated in the GC tissue by comparing them with tumor-adjacent non-malignant paired tissue. <h3>Results</h3> Twenty-six replicated plasma metabolites were identified in the discovery and validation dataset. Six features were selected to construct a metabolic panel with excellent diagnostic performance (AUCs of 0.947–0.982 in the discovery dataset and 0.920–0.951 in the validation dataset). The sensitivity of the panel (0.900–0.940) significantly outperformed traditional clinical protein biomarkers (0.020–0.240). The panel also exhibited promise in early GC detection, with AUCs of 0.914–0.961 in the discovery dataset and 0.894–0.940 in the validation dataset. Among the identified metabolites, eight were traced differentially expressed in GC and paired adjacent tissues, and two (2-hydroxy-3-methylvalerate, isovalerylcarnitine(C5)) were causally linked with GC in MR analysis. <h3>Conclusions</h3> This study identifies promising metabolic signatures for GC diagnosis and develops a reliable diagnostic model. The findings underscore the potential of metabolic analysis for accurate screening and early detection of GC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Gastroenterology
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2024-iddf.267
Primary Topic
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IDDF2024-ABS-0166 Metabolomics-driven plasma and tissue signatures and machine learning for gastric cancer diagnosis: a retrospective study and mendelian randomization study

Lingbin Du, Yida Huang, Xue Li, Juan Zhu
Clinical Gastroenterology
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
article

IDDF2024-ABS-0166 Metabolomics-driven plasma and tissue signatures and machine learning for gastric cancer diagnosis: a retrospective study and mendelian randomization study

Lingbin Du, Yida Huang, Xue Li, Juan Zhu
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Gastric cancer (GC) is a highly prevalent and deadly malignancy, necessitating timely diagnosis and intervention. However, current diagnoses predominantly hinge on gastroscopy, limited by invasiveness and low uptake rates. We aimed to develop diagnostic models for GC utilizing non-invasive plasma metabolic biomarkers. <h3>Methods</h3> We conducted a two-phase study involving 647 participants, comprising 277 GC and 370 non-GC. Candidate differential metabolites were identified in the discovery and validation phases using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, and a diagnostic model was developed using machine-learning algorithms. Then, mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was used to examine the causal association between metabolic biomarkers and the risk of GC. These metabolic biomarkers were validated in the GC tissue by comparing them with tumor-adjacent non-malignant paired tissue. <h3>Results</h3> Twenty-six replicated plasma metabolites were identified in the discovery and validation dataset. Six features were selected to construct a metabolic panel with excellent diagnostic performance (AUCs of 0.947–0.982 in the discovery dataset and 0.920–0.951 in the validation dataset). The sensitivity of the panel (0.900–0.940) significantly outperformed traditional clinical protein biomarkers (0.020–0.240). The panel also exhibited promise in early GC detection, with AUCs of 0.914–0.961 in the discovery dataset and 0.894–0.940 in the validation dataset. Among the identified metabolites, eight were traced differentially expressed in GC and paired adjacent tissues, and two (2-hydroxy-3-methylvalerate, isovalerylcarnitine(C5)) were causally linked with GC in MR analysis. <h3>Conclusions</h3> This study identifies promising metabolic signatures for GC diagnosis and develops a reliable diagnostic model. The findings underscore the potential of metabolic analysis for accurate screening and early detection of GC.

Clinical Gastroenterology
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.