IDDF2024-ABS-0235 Combining loco-regional therapy and sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective comparative study

<h3>Background</h3> Recent advances in systemic therapeutic options have significantly improved survival outcomes in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, optimizing treatment strategies across different disease stages remains a challenge. Combining loco-regional treatments with systemic therapies has gained interest as a potential approach to enhance patient outcomes. In this study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of combining locoregional therapy (transarterial chemoembolization [TACE] or radioembolization [TARE]) with sorafenib in a cohort of Saudi Arabian patients. <h3>Methods</h3> We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 60 HCC patients treated at a tertiary hospital, King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah. Among them, 43 patients received locoregional therapy (LRT) alone (TACE or TARE), while 17 patients were treated with a combination of locoregional therapy and sorafenib (LRTS). Demographic characteristics, BCLC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer) class distribution, treatment response rates, HCC progression, and adverse events were compared between the two groups. <h3>Results</h3> The LRT group had a slightly higher mean age (72 years) compared to the LRTS group (68 years), with more pronounced male predominance (88% vs. 81%, respectively). BCLC Stage A and B patients were more prevalent in the LRTS group than in the LRT group (59% vs 42% and 30% and 18%, respectively). The rates of complete response, partial response, and stable disease between LRT and LRTS were 30% vs. 18% (p = 0.32), 30% vs. 42% (p = 0.61) and 19% vs. 12% (p = 0.79). The HCC progression rate was 21% for LRT and 29% for LRTS (p = 0.72). The two-year survival rate was 9% for LRT and 6% for LRTS (p = 0.93). Adverse events were similar between techniques and included liver decompensation, a rise in transaminase, and abdominal pain. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Combining loco-regional therapy with sorafenib appears to be a promising approach in the management of HCC. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and refine treatment algorithms for this challenging malignancy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2024-iddf.191
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IDDF2024-ABS-0235 Combining loco-regional therapy and sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective comparative study

Wafi Almutawa, Noha Guzaiz, Abdulaziz Tashkandi, Laeeque A Qureshi et al.
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

IDDF2024-ABS-0235 Combining loco-regional therapy and sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective comparative study

Wafi Almutawa, Noha Guzaiz, Abdulaziz Tashkandi, Laeeque A Qureshi, Adnan Alzanbagi, Zaffar Mahmoud, Mohammed Sulaimani
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Recent advances in systemic therapeutic options have significantly improved survival outcomes in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, optimizing treatment strategies across different disease stages remains a challenge. Combining loco-regional treatments with systemic therapies has gained interest as a potential approach to enhance patient outcomes. In this study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of combining locoregional therapy (transarterial chemoembolization [TACE] or radioembolization [TARE]) with sorafenib in a cohort of Saudi Arabian patients. <h3>Methods</h3> We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 60 HCC patients treated at a tertiary hospital, King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah. Among them, 43 patients received locoregional therapy (LRT) alone (TACE or TARE), while 17 patients were treated with a combination of locoregional therapy and sorafenib (LRTS). Demographic characteristics, BCLC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer) class distribution, treatment response rates, HCC progression, and adverse events were compared between the two groups. <h3>Results</h3> The LRT group had a slightly higher mean age (72 years) compared to the LRTS group (68 years), with more pronounced male predominance (88% vs. 81%, respectively). BCLC Stage A and B patients were more prevalent in the LRTS group than in the LRT group (59% vs 42% and 30% and 18%, respectively). The rates of complete response, partial response, and stable disease between LRT and LRTS were 30% vs. 18% (p = 0.32), 30% vs. 42% (p = 0.61) and 19% vs. 12% (p = 0.79). The HCC progression rate was 21% for LRT and 29% for LRTS (p = 0.72). The two-year survival rate was 9% for LRT and 6% for LRTS (p = 0.93). Adverse events were similar between techniques and included liver decompensation, a rise in transaminase, and abdominal pain. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Combining loco-regional therapy with sorafenib appears to be a promising approach in the management of HCC. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and refine treatment algorithms for this challenging malignancy.

King Abdullah Medical City (SA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.