IDDF2024-ABS-0431 Machine learning models in predicting survival for colorectal cancer patients with type 2 diabetes: a 20-year follow-up of 10,749 subjects

<h3>Background</h3> Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to the general population. Several studies have suggested that the co-occurrence of these two chronic conditions can negatively impact patient outcomes, leading to poorer survival rates. This study aimed to identify factors that contribute to survival outcomes in this high-risk patient population to inform the development of more targeted and personalized management strategies to improve prognosis for CRC patients with pre-existing T2D. <h3>Methods</h3> We analyzed data from 10,749 participants in the Hong Kong Hospital Authority Data Collaboration Laboratory (HADLC) from 2000-2020. Various demographic and clinical variables were extracted, and several machine learning models, including Cox Proportional-Hazards (CoxPH), Lasso-regularized Cox (Coxnet), Random Survival Forest (RSF), Survival Decision Tree, and Gradient Boosting Survival Analysis (Coxboost), were used to predict CRC survival in T2D patients. Model performance was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index) and time-dependent area under the ROC curve (AUC). <h3>Results</h3> The key predictors of CRC survival in T2D patients were T2D diagnosis age (HR=1.072, p&lt;0.001), duration of T2D (HR=1.065, p&lt;0.001), use of anti-lipid drugs (HR=0.796, p&lt;0.001), central obesity (HR=0.830, p&lt;0.001), and LDL cholesterol levels (HR=1.422, p&lt;0.001). The Coxboost model achieved the highest C-index of 0.754 in the testing phase, outperforming the traditional CoxPH model (C-index=0.737). Shapley Additive Explanations (SurvSHAP) analysis showed that the duration of T2D, T2D diagnosis age, anti-lipid drug use, LDL cholesterol, and sex were the most influential factors on patient survival. <h3>Conclusions</h3> The machine learning models, particularly Coxboost and RSF, demonstrated superior performance in predicting CRC survival in T2D patients compared to the traditional CoxPH model. The identified risk factors can inform more targeted clinical management approaches for this high-risk patient population. By tailoring interventions based on these critical predictors, healthcare providers may be able to improve CRC survival rates among patients with concurrent T2D.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Gastroenterology
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2024-iddf.339
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IDDF2024-ABS-0431 Machine learning models in predicting survival for colorectal cancer patients with type 2 diabetes: a 20-year follow-up of 10,749 subjects

Martin C. S. Wong, Junjie Huang, Junjie Hang, Qi Dou et al.
Clinical Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

IDDF2024-ABS-0431 Machine learning models in predicting survival for colorectal cancer patients with type 2 diabetes: a 20-year follow-up of 10,749 subjects

Martin C. S. Wong, Junjie Huang, Junjie Hang, Qi Dou, Yu Li, Ziwei Huang, Claire Chenwen Zhong, Jin-Qiu Yuan, Yu Jiang
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to the general population. Several studies have suggested that the co-occurrence of these two chronic conditions can negatively impact patient outcomes, leading to poorer survival rates. This study aimed to identify factors that contribute to survival outcomes in this high-risk patient population to inform the development of more targeted and personalized management strategies to improve prognosis for CRC patients with pre-existing T2D. <h3>Methods</h3> We analyzed data from 10,749 participants in the Hong Kong Hospital Authority Data Collaboration Laboratory (HADLC) from 2000-2020. Various demographic and clinical variables were extracted, and several machine learning models, including Cox Proportional-Hazards (CoxPH), Lasso-regularized Cox (Coxnet), Random Survival Forest (RSF), Survival Decision Tree, and Gradient Boosting Survival Analysis (Coxboost), were used to predict CRC survival in T2D patients. Model performance was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index) and time-dependent area under the ROC curve (AUC). <h3>Results</h3> The key predictors of CRC survival in T2D patients were T2D diagnosis age (HR=1.072, p&lt;0.001), duration of T2D (HR=1.065, p&lt;0.001), use of anti-lipid drugs (HR=0.796, p&lt;0.001), central obesity (HR=0.830, p&lt;0.001), and LDL cholesterol levels (HR=1.422, p&lt;0.001). The Coxboost model achieved the highest C-index of 0.754 in the testing phase, outperforming the traditional CoxPH model (C-index=0.737). Shapley Additive Explanations (SurvSHAP) analysis showed that the duration of T2D, T2D diagnosis age, anti-lipid drug use, LDL cholesterol, and sex were the most influential factors on patient survival. <h3>Conclusions</h3> The machine learning models, particularly Coxboost and RSF, demonstrated superior performance in predicting CRC survival in T2D patients compared to the traditional CoxPH model. The identified risk factors can inform more targeted clinical management approaches for this high-risk patient population. By tailoring interventions based on these critical predictors, healthcare providers may be able to improve CRC survival rates among patients with concurrent T2D.

Clinical Gastroenterology
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN), The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.