IDDF2024-ABS-0233 Prevalence, clinical features, and associations of symptom-based Rome-IV irritable bowel syndrome in adults in Saudi Arabia: a population-based Study

<h3>Background</h3> Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional gastrointestinal disorder with a significant impact on quality of life. However, data on the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and associations of symptom-based Rome IV IBS in the Saudi Arabian population are scarce. In this cross-sectional population-based study, we aimed to assess the prevalence, clinical features, and associations of symptom-based Rome IV IBS in adults across Saudi Arabia. <h3>Methods</h3> We collected data from 2000 participants representing different regions of Saudi Arabia to ensure national representation. The study employed the following: 1) Participant Invitation from five distinct regions of KSA. 2) Questionnaire Administration, including demographic data and medical history, and the ROME IV Diagnostic Questionnaire (Arabic Version) to assess symptom-based criteria for Rome IV IBS. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-12) (Arabic Version), a validated somatization questionnaire that scored participants’ non-GI symptoms, and Short Form (SF-8) (Arabic Version) to evaluate the quality of life (QOL) of participants. 3) Distribution Channels: The questionnaires were distributed via the internet and social media apps (WhatsApp, Twitter, Facebook, Snapchat). For participants with limited internet or social media access, in-person administration was used. <h3>Results</h3> The prevalence of symptom-based Rome IV IBS in our study population was 3.9% (95% Confidence interval: 3.1%-4.9%). The overall IBS subtype distribution was 16.9% IBS-D, 31.0% IBS-C, 40.8% IBS-M, and 11.3% IBS-U. IBS was more common in females than males (76.1% vs. 64.9%, respectively), but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.053). Also, there was no age difference between participants with or without IBS (p=0.742). Using the PHQ-12, IBS was significantly associated with high somatization compared to non-IBS participants (54.9% vs. 15.3%, p&lt;0.001). The SF-8 score was significantly lower in IBS participants (41.9±9.2) compared to those without IBS (50.3±9.9, p&lt;0.001). IBS participants used anti-diarrheal, laxatives, and antispasmodics more commonly than those without IBS. <h3>Conclusions</h3> This study underscores the burden of symptom-based Rome IV IBS in Saudi Arabia. Understanding the clinical characteristics and associations of IBS is crucial for effective management and healthcare planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Gastroenterology
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2024-iddf.278
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IDDF2024-ABS-0233 Prevalence, clinical features, and associations of symptom-based Rome-IV irritable bowel syndrome in adults in Saudi Arabia: a population-based Study

Yaser Meeralam, Lujain Alamer, Basant A Alzubaidy, Adnan Alzanbagi et al.
Clinical Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

IDDF2024-ABS-0233 Prevalence, clinical features, and associations of symptom-based Rome-IV irritable bowel syndrome in adults in Saudi Arabia: a population-based Study

Yaser Meeralam, Lujain Alamer, Basant A Alzubaidy, Adnan Alzanbagi, Mohammed A. Khan, Zeyad Alzahrani, Salem Alotaibi, Mohamed Waseem Osman, Reema Alotaibi
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional gastrointestinal disorder with a significant impact on quality of life. However, data on the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and associations of symptom-based Rome IV IBS in the Saudi Arabian population are scarce. In this cross-sectional population-based study, we aimed to assess the prevalence, clinical features, and associations of symptom-based Rome IV IBS in adults across Saudi Arabia. <h3>Methods</h3> We collected data from 2000 participants representing different regions of Saudi Arabia to ensure national representation. The study employed the following: 1) Participant Invitation from five distinct regions of KSA. 2) Questionnaire Administration, including demographic data and medical history, and the ROME IV Diagnostic Questionnaire (Arabic Version) to assess symptom-based criteria for Rome IV IBS. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-12) (Arabic Version), a validated somatization questionnaire that scored participants’ non-GI symptoms, and Short Form (SF-8) (Arabic Version) to evaluate the quality of life (QOL) of participants. 3) Distribution Channels: The questionnaires were distributed via the internet and social media apps (WhatsApp, Twitter, Facebook, Snapchat). For participants with limited internet or social media access, in-person administration was used. <h3>Results</h3> The prevalence of symptom-based Rome IV IBS in our study population was 3.9% (95% Confidence interval: 3.1%-4.9%). The overall IBS subtype distribution was 16.9% IBS-D, 31.0% IBS-C, 40.8% IBS-M, and 11.3% IBS-U. IBS was more common in females than males (76.1% vs. 64.9%, respectively), but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.053). Also, there was no age difference between participants with or without IBS (p=0.742). Using the PHQ-12, IBS was significantly associated with high somatization compared to non-IBS participants (54.9% vs. 15.3%, p&lt;0.001). The SF-8 score was significantly lower in IBS participants (41.9±9.2) compared to those without IBS (50.3±9.9, p&lt;0.001). IBS participants used anti-diarrheal, laxatives, and antispasmodics more commonly than those without IBS. <h3>Conclusions</h3> This study underscores the burden of symptom-based Rome IV IBS in Saudi Arabia. Understanding the clinical characteristics and associations of IBS is crucial for effective management and healthcare planning.

Clinical Gastroenterology
Umm al-Qura University (SA), Security Forces Hospital (SA), King Abdullah Medical City (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.