Clinical and Surgical Outcomes of Shoulder Arthrodesis

<b>Introduction:</b> Shoulder arthrodesis is typically seen as a salvage procedure with limited functional objectives. In appropriately selected patients, it may effectively alleviate pain, provide stable motion, and offer patient function satisfaction. However, there have been few reports on the outcomes following shoulder arthrodesis. <b>Methods:</b> A multicenter, retrospective chart review of patients undergoing shoulder arthrodesis between 2001 and 2023 in Western Australia was conducted. Clinical records and imaging were then reviewed to determine patient demographics. A cross-sectional analysis of Visual Analogue (VAS), Oxford Shoulder (OSS), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (ASES) Scores, satisfaction and complication rates was conducted. <b>Results:</b> In total, 14 patients with a mean age of 39.5 years (range 22-52 years, 71% male) with a mean follow-up of 7.4 years (range 3 months-18 years) were identified. The most common indications for arthrodesis included osteoarthritis (8, 57%) and instability (6, 43%). Major contributory factors were recurrent seizures (5, 36%) and multiple surgeries (4, 29%). Radiographic union was observed in 13 (93%) patients. The mean VAS was 2.8 (range 0-7), mean OSS was 33.0 (range 23-42) and ASES score was 55.4 (range 37-82). In total, 11 patients (79%) reported being satisfied. Five (36%) patients returned to theatre for complications. <b>Conclusions</b>: In this patient series, shoulder arthrodesis demonstrates a notable efficacy in pain reduction, high satisfaction, acceptable function, and complication rates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164701
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and Surgical Outcomes of Shoulder Arthrodesis

Grant Booth, Kieran Bochat, Sheldon Moniz, Andrew Mattin et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Clinical and Surgical Outcomes of Shoulder Arthrodesis

Grant Booth, Kieran Bochat, Sheldon Moniz, Andrew Mattin, Salar Sobhi
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> Shoulder arthrodesis is typically seen as a salvage procedure with limited functional objectives. In appropriately selected patients, it may effectively alleviate pain, provide stable motion, and offer patient function satisfaction. However, there have been few reports on the outcomes following shoulder arthrodesis. <b>Methods:</b> A multicenter, retrospective chart review of patients undergoing shoulder arthrodesis between 2001 and 2023 in Western Australia was conducted. Clinical records and imaging were then reviewed to determine patient demographics. A cross-sectional analysis of Visual Analogue (VAS), Oxford Shoulder (OSS), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (ASES) Scores, satisfaction and complication rates was conducted. <b>Results:</b> In total, 14 patients with a mean age of 39.5 years (range 22-52 years, 71% male) with a mean follow-up of 7.4 years (range 3 months-18 years) were identified. The most common indications for arthrodesis included osteoarthritis (8, 57%) and instability (6, 43%). Major contributory factors were recurrent seizures (5, 36%) and multiple surgeries (4, 29%). Radiographic union was observed in 13 (93%) patients. The mean VAS was 2.8 (range 0-7), mean OSS was 33.0 (range 23-42) and ASES score was 55.4 (range 37-82). In total, 11 patients (79%) reported being satisfied. Five (36%) patients returned to theatre for complications. <b>Conclusions</b>: In this patient series, shoulder arthrodesis demonstrates a notable efficacy in pain reduction, high satisfaction, acceptable function, and complication rates.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(16)
Royal Perth Hospital (AU), Orthopaedic Research Foundation (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.