IDDF2024-ABS-0397 Safety of stopping non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) according to baveno VII consensus in patients with cirrhosis and well-controlled liver disease aetiology

<h3>Background</h3> Baveno VII consensus suggests discontinuing NSBBs in patients with cirrhosis and controlled primary aetiological factor if liver stiffness measurement (LSM) is &lt;25 kPa and endoscopy no longer shows any varices. We evaluated the safety of this recommendation. <h3>Methods</h3> Patients who underwent vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) at Prince of Wales Hospital from Aug 2005 to Dec 2022 were included. The baseline date was the first date of stopping NSBB or a random date after VCTE for NSBB continuous users and non-users. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or hepatic decompensation before or &lt;180 days after baseline were excluded. NSBB use referred to ≥28 days of cumulative use with ≥2 prescriptions. Stopping NSBB referred to ≥28 days of cessation without a subsequent prescription. Patients were followed until hepatic decompensation, death, or restarting NSBB for those who stopped, whichever earlier; non-liver-related death was a competing event. <h3>Results</h3> Among 4,748 patients (mean age 55.1 years, 45.2% females, mean LSM 7.1 kPa, 37.7% viral hepatitis, 41.4% metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease), 77 (1.6%) developed hepatic decompensation at a median (IQR) follow-up of 4.4 (2.0-9.5) years. Among 4,464 NSBB non-users, 110 continuous users, and 174 patients who stopped NSBB, 57, 18, and 2 developed hepatic decompensation, respectively; the corresponding 5-year cumulative incidence (95% CI) was 1.3% (1.0%-1.7%), 18.9% (11.3%-27.9%), and 1.5% (0.1%-7.2%) (IDDF2024-ABS-0397 Figure 1). Compared to NSBB non-users, patients who stopped NSBB had a similar risk of hepatic decompensation (cause-specific hazard ratio [CSHR] 1.08 [95% CI 0.26-4.47]), while NSBB continuous users had a higher risk (3.40 [1.98-7.94]). Similar results were shown among 680 patients with LSM ≥10 kPa (CSHR [95% CI] 0.71 [0.10-5.33] for patients who stopped NSBB vs NSBB non-users). Patients with LSM ≥10 kPa fulfilling Baveno VII criteria had a comparable risk of hepatic decompensation (1.25 [0.44-3.54]) to those with LSM &lt;10 kPa (IDDF2024-ABS-0397 Table 1). <h3>Conclusions</h3> Patients with cirrhosis and removed/suppressed primary aetiological factors may safely stop NSBBs. Their subsequent risk of hepatic decompensation is similar to those who did not require NSBBs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2024-iddf.208
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IDDF2024-ABS-0397 Safety of stopping non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) according to baveno VII consensus in patients with cirrhosis and well-controlled liver disease aetiology

Terry Cheuk‐Fung Yip, Jimmy Che‐To Lai, Grace Lai–Hung Wong, Vincent Wai-Sun Wong et al.
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

IDDF2024-ABS-0397 Safety of stopping non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) according to baveno VII consensus in patients with cirrhosis and well-controlled liver disease aetiology

Terry Cheuk‐Fung Yip, Jimmy Che‐To Lai, Grace Lai–Hung Wong, Vincent Wai-Sun Wong, Tony Hiu-Fung Lam
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Baveno VII consensus suggests discontinuing NSBBs in patients with cirrhosis and controlled primary aetiological factor if liver stiffness measurement (LSM) is &lt;25 kPa and endoscopy no longer shows any varices. We evaluated the safety of this recommendation. <h3>Methods</h3> Patients who underwent vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) at Prince of Wales Hospital from Aug 2005 to Dec 2022 were included. The baseline date was the first date of stopping NSBB or a random date after VCTE for NSBB continuous users and non-users. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or hepatic decompensation before or &lt;180 days after baseline were excluded. NSBB use referred to ≥28 days of cumulative use with ≥2 prescriptions. Stopping NSBB referred to ≥28 days of cessation without a subsequent prescription. Patients were followed until hepatic decompensation, death, or restarting NSBB for those who stopped, whichever earlier; non-liver-related death was a competing event. <h3>Results</h3> Among 4,748 patients (mean age 55.1 years, 45.2% females, mean LSM 7.1 kPa, 37.7% viral hepatitis, 41.4% metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease), 77 (1.6%) developed hepatic decompensation at a median (IQR) follow-up of 4.4 (2.0-9.5) years. Among 4,464 NSBB non-users, 110 continuous users, and 174 patients who stopped NSBB, 57, 18, and 2 developed hepatic decompensation, respectively; the corresponding 5-year cumulative incidence (95% CI) was 1.3% (1.0%-1.7%), 18.9% (11.3%-27.9%), and 1.5% (0.1%-7.2%) (IDDF2024-ABS-0397 Figure 1). Compared to NSBB non-users, patients who stopped NSBB had a similar risk of hepatic decompensation (cause-specific hazard ratio [CSHR] 1.08 [95% CI 0.26-4.47]), while NSBB continuous users had a higher risk (3.40 [1.98-7.94]). Similar results were shown among 680 patients with LSM ≥10 kPa (CSHR [95% CI] 0.71 [0.10-5.33] for patients who stopped NSBB vs NSBB non-users). Patients with LSM ≥10 kPa fulfilling Baveno VII criteria had a comparable risk of hepatic decompensation (1.25 [0.44-3.54]) to those with LSM &lt;10 kPa (IDDF2024-ABS-0397 Table 1). <h3>Conclusions</h3> Patients with cirrhosis and removed/suppressed primary aetiological factors may safely stop NSBBs. Their subsequent risk of hepatic decompensation is similar to those who did not require NSBBs.

Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.