IDDF2024-ABS-0438 Does linaclotide have high predictability of defecation? A post-hoc analysis of apple trial

<h3>Background</h3> Many patients with constipation are not satisfied with the predictability of defecation after taking laxatives and expect laxatives with fast responses that can predict the timing of defecation. Linaclotide, a GC -C receptor agonist, is recently approved for chronic constipation with an early onset of action. However, there is a limited information about the onset of defecation after taking linaclotide. We aimed to investigate the reactivity to defecation of a single-dose of linaclotide in chronic constipated patients. <h3>Methods</h3> We performed a post-hoc analysis in constipated patients with a per-protocol group of APPLE trial; reporting the efficacy of 0.5 mg dose of linaclotide vs 24 mg dose of senna as an adjuvant for bowel preparation (BP). We assessed the first defecation time, defecation frequency, and adverse events after taking either of the adjuvant until the start of BP solution on the day of the colonoscopy. The degree of constipation was measured using the Constipation Scoring System (CSS; range, 0–30). <h3>Results</h3> Among 352 constipated patients, 170 patients receiving linaclotide and 182 patients receiving senna were evaluated. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable, and the median (IQR) CSS score was similar between the two groups; 6 (3–9) in the linaclotide group and 6 (3–9) in the senna group (<i>P</i>=0.50). The rate of having at least one defecation until the morning was significantly higher in the linaclotide group than in the senna group (59% vs. 39%, <i>P</i>&lt;0.01), and the median (IQR) first defecation time (hours) was faster in the linaclotide group than in the senna group (2.8 (1.5-8.8) vs. 9.9 (8.3-11), <i>P</i>&lt;0.01). The median frequency (IQR) of defecation was also higher in the linaclotide group than in the senna group (1 (0-2) vs. 0 (0-1), <i>P</i>&lt;0.01). Adverse events including vomiting, abdominal pain and discomfort, and quality of sleep were comparable between the two groups. <h3>Conclusions</h3> A single dose of linaclotide had an early onset of defecation without reducing the patient’s tolerability compared to senna. It may be a promising treatment drug for constipation with high predictability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Gastroenterology
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2024-iddf.341
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IDDF2024-ABS-0438 Does linaclotide have high predictability of defecation? A post-hoc analysis of apple trial

Natsumi Maeda, Yasuhiro Fujiwara, Akira Higashimori
Clinical Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

IDDF2024-ABS-0438 Does linaclotide have high predictability of defecation? A post-hoc analysis of apple trial

Natsumi Maeda, Yasuhiro Fujiwara, Akira Higashimori
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Many patients with constipation are not satisfied with the predictability of defecation after taking laxatives and expect laxatives with fast responses that can predict the timing of defecation. Linaclotide, a GC -C receptor agonist, is recently approved for chronic constipation with an early onset of action. However, there is a limited information about the onset of defecation after taking linaclotide. We aimed to investigate the reactivity to defecation of a single-dose of linaclotide in chronic constipated patients. <h3>Methods</h3> We performed a post-hoc analysis in constipated patients with a per-protocol group of APPLE trial; reporting the efficacy of 0.5 mg dose of linaclotide vs 24 mg dose of senna as an adjuvant for bowel preparation (BP). We assessed the first defecation time, defecation frequency, and adverse events after taking either of the adjuvant until the start of BP solution on the day of the colonoscopy. The degree of constipation was measured using the Constipation Scoring System (CSS; range, 0–30). <h3>Results</h3> Among 352 constipated patients, 170 patients receiving linaclotide and 182 patients receiving senna were evaluated. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable, and the median (IQR) CSS score was similar between the two groups; 6 (3–9) in the linaclotide group and 6 (3–9) in the senna group (<i>P</i>=0.50). The rate of having at least one defecation until the morning was significantly higher in the linaclotide group than in the senna group (59% vs. 39%, <i>P</i>&lt;0.01), and the median (IQR) first defecation time (hours) was faster in the linaclotide group than in the senna group (2.8 (1.5-8.8) vs. 9.9 (8.3-11), <i>P</i>&lt;0.01). The median frequency (IQR) of defecation was also higher in the linaclotide group than in the senna group (1 (0-2) vs. 0 (0-1), <i>P</i>&lt;0.01). Adverse events including vomiting, abdominal pain and discomfort, and quality of sleep were comparable between the two groups. <h3>Conclusions</h3> A single dose of linaclotide had an early onset of defecation without reducing the patient’s tolerability compared to senna. It may be a promising treatment drug for constipation with high predictability.

Clinical Gastroenterology
Osaka Metropolitan University (JP), Tokyo Metropolitan University (JP)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.