A five domains assessment of sow welfare in a novel free farrowing system

The Maternity Ring was developed as a free farrowing alternative to crates that preserved space whilst providing the sow with unrestricted movement. This experiment aimed to apply the Five Domains model to assess sow welfare in the Maternity Ring in comparison with the farrowing crate. Eighty-eight sows were housed in a farrowing crate (FC) and 83 in a Maternity Ring (MR), and measures collected focussed on nutrition, environment, health, behaviour, and mental state outcomes. MR sows consumed less feed than FC sows (total feed intake: 93.8 ± 3.06 kg vs. 111.2 ± 3.13 kg; <i>p</i> < 0.001) but had reduced P2 backfat loss during lactation (0.0 ± 0.11 vs. 1.2 ± 0.11, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Fewer frustrated and pain-related behaviours during farrowing were observed in MR sows (bar biting: FC 3.3 ± 2.12 vs. MR 0.5 ± 0.29 events, <i>p</i> = 0.038, and back leg forward: FC 227 ± 50.7 vs. MR 127 ± 26.4 events, <i>p</i> = 0.019), and a decreased proportion of MR sows had facial injuries after farrowing (10% CI [5, 20] vs. 67% CI [47, 95], <i>p</i> < 0.001). More FC sows had udder damage at weaning (70% CI [48, 97] vs. 10% CI [6, 24], <i>p</i> < 0.001), and their piglets were medicated more frequently when compared to those in MR (51% CI [40, 61] vs. 30% [21, 41], <i>p</i> = 0.008). MR sows tended to have a higher reaction score to piglet processing (MR 2.0 ± 0.38 vs. FC 1.2 ± 0.27, <i>p</i> = 0.094) and had more contact with piglets once the procedure was complete than FC sows (13.5 ± 2.55 vs. 6.9 ± 1.26 events, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.016). Whilst there was no difference in anticipation of a feeding event (<i>p</i> > 0.05), MR sows displayed a reduced startle response to an aversive noise stimulus at day 18 (FC 2.8 ± 0.35, MR 0.7 ± 0.16, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Using the Five Domains framework, sows housed in the MR during farrowing and lactation have improved welfare than those in FC and can be thought of as being in a positive affective state.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1339947
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A five domains assessment of sow welfare in a novel free farrowing system

D. S. Lines, L.M. Staveley, K.J. Plush, R. J. van Barneveld et al.
8 citations
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
5.11
article

A five domains assessment of sow welfare in a novel free farrowing system

D. S. Lines, L.M. Staveley, K.J. Plush, R. J. van Barneveld, D.N. D’Souza
article en
8 citations

Abstract

The Maternity Ring was developed as a free farrowing alternative to crates that preserved space whilst providing the sow with unrestricted movement. This experiment aimed to apply the Five Domains model to assess sow welfare in the Maternity Ring in comparison with the farrowing crate. Eighty-eight sows were housed in a farrowing crate (FC) and 83 in a Maternity Ring (MR), and measures collected focussed on nutrition, environment, health, behaviour, and mental state outcomes. MR sows consumed less feed than FC sows (total feed intake: 93.8 ± 3.06 kg vs. 111.2 ± 3.13 kg; <i>p</i> < 0.001) but had reduced P2 backfat loss during lactation (0.0 ± 0.11 vs. 1.2 ± 0.11, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Fewer frustrated and pain-related behaviours during farrowing were observed in MR sows (bar biting: FC 3.3 ± 2.12 vs. MR 0.5 ± 0.29 events, <i>p</i> = 0.038, and back leg forward: FC 227 ± 50.7 vs. MR 127 ± 26.4 events, <i>p</i> = 0.019), and a decreased proportion of MR sows had facial injuries after farrowing (10% CI [5, 20] vs. 67% CI [47, 95], <i>p</i> < 0.001). More FC sows had udder damage at weaning (70% CI [48, 97] vs. 10% CI [6, 24], <i>p</i> < 0.001), and their piglets were medicated more frequently when compared to those in MR (51% CI [40, 61] vs. 30% [21, 41], <i>p</i> = 0.008). MR sows tended to have a higher reaction score to piglet processing (MR 2.0 ± 0.38 vs. FC 1.2 ± 0.27, <i>p</i> = 0.094) and had more contact with piglets once the procedure was complete than FC sows (13.5 ± 2.55 vs. 6.9 ± 1.26 events, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.016). Whilst there was no difference in anticipation of a feeding event (<i>p</i> > 0.05), MR sows displayed a reduced startle response to an aversive noise stimulus at day 18 (FC 2.8 ± 0.35, MR 0.7 ± 0.16, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Using the Five Domains framework, sows housed in the MR during farrowing and lactation have improved welfare than those in FC and can be thought of as being in a positive affective state.

Frontiers in Veterinary ScienceVol. 11
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
5.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A five domains assessment of sow welfare in a novel free farrowing system — D. S. Lines, L.M. Staveley, et al. · Frontiers in Veterinary Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS