Adherence to Labor Arrest and Failed Induction of Labor Guidelines: The Impact of a Quality-Improvement Educational Intervention

<b>Background/Objective:</b> To evaluate adherence to labor arrest and failed induction of labor (IOL) criteria in nulliparous, term, singleton, and vertex (NTSV) cesarean deliveries at an academic medical center and to measure the impact of a quality-improvement educational initiative that focused on obstetric provider education of modern labor arrest and failed IOL criteria. <b>Methods:</b> This is a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record (EHR) data with a pre- (1 September 2018-30 September 2019) and post-intervention (1 October 2019-31 March 2020) study design of all NTSV cesarean deliveries for labor arrest or failed IOL performed at an academic medical center in the northeastern United States. The quality-improvement educational intervention consisted of the distribution of educational pocket cards outlining modern labor arrest and failed IOL criteria to obstetric providers. Outcomes included adherence to labor arrest and failed IOL criteria pre- and post-intervention with secondary outcomes evaluating adherence by provider type (Maternal-Fetal Medicine (MFM) or generalist obstetrician). Descriptive and bivariate statistics were used in the analysis. <b>Results:</b> Pre-intervention, 272 NTSV cesarean deliveries were performed for labor arrest or failed IOL versus 92 post-intervention. Adherence improved post-intervention amongst failed IOL (OR 6.5, CI 1.8-23.8), first-stage arrest (OR 4.5, CI 2.2-10.8) and second-stage arrest (OR 3.7, CI 1.5-9.4). When comparing provider type, MFM physicians were more likely to be adherent to labor arrest and failed IOL criteria compared to generalist obstetricians pre-intervention (OR 3.1, CI 1.7-5.5); however, post-intervention, there was no longer a difference in adherence (OR 3.3, CI 0.9-12.3). <b>Conclusions:</b> Adherence to labor arrest criteria was suboptimal in the pre-intervention period; however, a targeted quality-improvement educational intervention improved adherence rates to labor arrest and failed IOL criteria among obstetric providers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164720
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adherence to Labor Arrest and Failed Induction of Labor Guidelines: The Impact of a Quality-Improvement Educational Intervention

Meagan Campol, Christian M. Pettker, Jennifer J. M. Cate, Christopher Ke Arkfeld et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
0.58
article

Adherence to Labor Arrest and Failed Induction of Labor Guidelines: The Impact of a Quality-Improvement Educational Intervention

Meagan Campol, Christian M. Pettker, Jennifer J. M. Cate, Christopher Ke Arkfeld, Katherine H. Campbell, Jessica L. Illuzzi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objective:</b> To evaluate adherence to labor arrest and failed induction of labor (IOL) criteria in nulliparous, term, singleton, and vertex (NTSV) cesarean deliveries at an academic medical center and to measure the impact of a quality-improvement educational initiative that focused on obstetric provider education of modern labor arrest and failed IOL criteria. <b>Methods:</b> This is a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record (EHR) data with a pre- (1 September 2018-30 September 2019) and post-intervention (1 October 2019-31 March 2020) study design of all NTSV cesarean deliveries for labor arrest or failed IOL performed at an academic medical center in the northeastern United States. The quality-improvement educational intervention consisted of the distribution of educational pocket cards outlining modern labor arrest and failed IOL criteria to obstetric providers. Outcomes included adherence to labor arrest and failed IOL criteria pre- and post-intervention with secondary outcomes evaluating adherence by provider type (Maternal-Fetal Medicine (MFM) or generalist obstetrician). Descriptive and bivariate statistics were used in the analysis. <b>Results:</b> Pre-intervention, 272 NTSV cesarean deliveries were performed for labor arrest or failed IOL versus 92 post-intervention. Adherence improved post-intervention amongst failed IOL (OR 6.5, CI 1.8-23.8), first-stage arrest (OR 4.5, CI 2.2-10.8) and second-stage arrest (OR 3.7, CI 1.5-9.4). When comparing provider type, MFM physicians were more likely to be adherent to labor arrest and failed IOL criteria compared to generalist obstetricians pre-intervention (OR 3.1, CI 1.7-5.5); however, post-intervention, there was no longer a difference in adherence (OR 3.3, CI 0.9-12.3). <b>Conclusions:</b> Adherence to labor arrest criteria was suboptimal in the pre-intervention period; however, a targeted quality-improvement educational intervention improved adherence rates to labor arrest and failed IOL criteria among obstetric providers.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(16)
Duke University (US), Yale University (US)
Yale University
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
0.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.