“Don’t research us”—How Mastodon instance rules connect to research ethics

Abstract Mastodon is a decentralized social network that has recently gained in popularity due to the platform changes of Twitter (now X). When it comes to collecting and analyzing data, the technical structure of such a decentralized network not only has methodological but also ethical implications. Mastodon consists of a large number of individual instances (around 17k), and each of these instances typically have their own set of rules, which may also address the use of data. Against this backdrop, we investigated whether and how Mastodon instances address the scientific use of data. Our analyses focused on active instances with English-language rules. Based on a combination of quantitative and qualitative content analysis, our results show that only a small portion of instances mention the scientific use of their data. Instead, the majority of rules rather focuses on user behavior and interactions. Based on the results, we formulate recommendations for researchers who want to work with Mastodon data. The recommendations are informed by the results of our empirical study and guided by general ethical principles for the examination of data from social media.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Publizistik
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-024-00855-6
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Don’t research us”—How Mastodon instance rules connect to research ethics

Katrin Weller, Johannes Breuer, Annika Deubel, Marco Wähner
16 citations
Publizistik
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
18.11
article

“Don’t research us”—How Mastodon instance rules connect to research ethics

Katrin Weller, Johannes Breuer, Annika Deubel, Marco Wähner
article en
16 citations

Abstract

Abstract Mastodon is a decentralized social network that has recently gained in popularity due to the platform changes of Twitter (now X). When it comes to collecting and analyzing data, the technical structure of such a decentralized network not only has methodological but also ethical implications. Mastodon consists of a large number of individual instances (around 17k), and each of these instances typically have their own set of rules, which may also address the use of data. Against this backdrop, we investigated whether and how Mastodon instances address the scientific use of data. Our analyses focused on active instances with English-language rules. Based on a combination of quantitative and qualitative content analysis, our results show that only a small portion of instances mention the scientific use of their data. Instead, the majority of rules rather focuses on user behavior and interactions. Based on the results, we formulate recommendations for researchers who want to work with Mastodon data. The recommendations are informed by the results of our empirical study and guided by general ethical principles for the examination of data from social media.

PublizistikVol. 69(3)
GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (DE), Center for Advanced Internet Studies (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
18.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.