Greenium of green securitization: Does external certification matter?

The financing costs of green asset-backed securities (ABS) are deeply affected by the increased information asymmetry and greenwashing risk resulting from risk transferring in securitization. To attract potential investors, many ABS issuers obtain external certifications, yet it is unclear whether they pay off financially. Based on a sample of 588 green ABS issued in China for 2016-2022, this paper examines the impact of external certification in the form of green certification and reputation of financial intermediaries involved in the issuance on the yield discount of green ABS over the paired non-green ABS. The empirical findings show that both external certifications lower the greenium of green ABS by serving as favorable signals and mitigating greenwashing concerns, especially in non-financial industry and the securities exchange market. Moreover, the information asymmetry and credit risk of issuers enhance the pricing effect of financial intermediary certification but undermine that of green certification. Our findings provide valuable implications to facilitate the financing efficiency of green financial markets and promote global low-carbon transition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306814
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Greenium of green securitization: Does external certification matter?

Bo Zhu, Xiru Li, Yufei Zhang
5 citations
PLoS ONE
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
2.70
article

Greenium of green securitization: Does external certification matter?

Bo Zhu, Xiru Li, Yufei Zhang
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The financing costs of green asset-backed securities (ABS) are deeply affected by the increased information asymmetry and greenwashing risk resulting from risk transferring in securitization. To attract potential investors, many ABS issuers obtain external certifications, yet it is unclear whether they pay off financially. Based on a sample of 588 green ABS issued in China for 2016-2022, this paper examines the impact of external certification in the form of green certification and reputation of financial intermediaries involved in the issuance on the yield discount of green ABS over the paired non-green ABS. The empirical findings show that both external certifications lower the greenium of green ABS by serving as favorable signals and mitigating greenwashing concerns, especially in non-financial industry and the securities exchange market. Moreover, the information asymmetry and credit risk of issuers enhance the pricing effect of financial intermediary certification but undermine that of green certification. Our findings provide valuable implications to facilitate the financing efficiency of green financial markets and promote global low-carbon transition.

PLoS ONEVol. 19(8)
Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Ministry of Education, India
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
2.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Greenium of green securitization: Does external certification matter? — Bo Zhu, Xiru Li, et al. · PLoS ONE (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS