Profiling Chinese university students’ understandings of plagiarism through Q methodology

This study adopted Q methodology to construct a holistic configuration of Chinese university students' understandings of plagiarism. Twenty-five Chinese undergraduate students sorted 48 statements on plagiarism. Following the Q sorting, eight participants took part in a follow-up interview to justify their sorting. The study identified three distinct profiles of viewpoints on plagiarism: (a) highly condemnatory and punitive with a focus on practical causes, (b) moderately condemnatory with an emphasis on learning, (c) highly condemnatory with a focus on honor and self-accountability. These viewpoints are discussed with reference to the moral, developmental, and regulatory discourses on plagiarism in the literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethics & Behavior
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2024.2389541
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Profiling Chinese university students’ understandings of plagiarism through Q methodology

Jun Lei, Jiahao Pan
3 citations
Ethics & Behavior
Academic integrity and plagiarism
1.58
article

Profiling Chinese university students’ understandings of plagiarism through Q methodology

Jun Lei, Jiahao Pan
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study adopted Q methodology to construct a holistic configuration of Chinese university students' understandings of plagiarism. Twenty-five Chinese undergraduate students sorted 48 statements on plagiarism. Following the Q sorting, eight participants took part in a follow-up interview to justify their sorting. The study identified three distinct profiles of viewpoints on plagiarism: (a) highly condemnatory and punitive with a focus on practical causes, (b) moderately condemnatory with an emphasis on learning, (c) highly condemnatory with a focus on honor and self-accountability. These viewpoints are discussed with reference to the moral, developmental, and regulatory discourses on plagiarism in the literature.

Ethics & BehaviorVol. 35(5)
Ningbo University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
1.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.