A multiscale modeling to determine in vitro mechanical responses of different cells at the cell‐substrate interface under fluid perfusion

Investigating the influence of different cellular mechanical and physical properties on cells in vitro is important for assessing cellular activities like differentiation, proliferation, and migration. Evaluating the mechanical response of the cells lodged on a scaffold due to variations in substrate roughness, substrate elasticity, fluid flow, and the shapes of the cells is the main goal of the study. In this comprehensive analysis, a combination of the fluid structure interaction method and the submodeled finite element technique was employed to anticipate the mechanical responses across various cells at the interface between cells and the substrate. Fluid inlet velocity, substrate roughness, and substrate material were varied in this analysis. Different cell shapes were considered along with various components such as cell membrane, cytoplasm, nucleus, and cytoskeletons. This analysis shows the effect of these individual parameters on the elastic strain and strain energy density of cells at the cell-substrate interface. The results highlight that substrate roughness has a more significant impact on the mechanical response of cells at the interface than substrate elasticity. However, effect of the substrate elasticity becomes crucial for extremely soft substrate materials. The results of this research can be applied to identify the optimal parameters for fluid flow and create a suitable condition for cell culture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.35462
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multiscale modeling to determine in vitro mechanical responses of different cells at the cell‐substrate interface under fluid perfusion

Apurba Das, Rupak K. Banerjee, Ananya Barui, Abhisek Gupta et al.
1 citations
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials
Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
0.33
article

A multiscale modeling to determine in vitro mechanical responses of different cells at the cell‐substrate interface under fluid perfusion

Apurba Das, Rupak K. Banerjee, Ananya Barui, Abhisek Gupta, Amit Roy Chowdhury
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Investigating the influence of different cellular mechanical and physical properties on cells in vitro is important for assessing cellular activities like differentiation, proliferation, and migration. Evaluating the mechanical response of the cells lodged on a scaffold due to variations in substrate roughness, substrate elasticity, fluid flow, and the shapes of the cells is the main goal of the study. In this comprehensive analysis, a combination of the fluid structure interaction method and the submodeled finite element technique was employed to anticipate the mechanical responses across various cells at the interface between cells and the substrate. Fluid inlet velocity, substrate roughness, and substrate material were varied in this analysis. Different cell shapes were considered along with various components such as cell membrane, cytoplasm, nucleus, and cytoskeletons. This analysis shows the effect of these individual parameters on the elastic strain and strain energy density of cells at the cell-substrate interface. The results highlight that substrate roughness has a more significant impact on the mechanical response of cells at the interface than substrate elasticity. However, effect of the substrate elasticity becomes crucial for extremely soft substrate materials. The results of this research can be applied to identify the optimal parameters for fluid flow and create a suitable condition for cell culture.

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied BiomaterialsVol. 112(8)
University of Cincinnati (US), Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur (IN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A multiscale modeling to determine in vitro mechanical responses of different cells at the cell‐substrate interface under fluid perfusion — Apurba Das, Rupak K. Banerjee, et al. · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS