Wireless In-Ear Communication for Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Simulated Operating Room Evaluation

Effective communication is vital for patient safety, yet failures are common, often due to outdated methods. This study aimed to assess whether in-ear communication devices improve communication in orthopedic surgery simulations compared to traditional loud voice methods. Fifteen participants underwent simulations using both in-ear wireless devices and standard communication. Results showed significant improvements with in-ear devices in correctly identifying phrases (78.6% vs 44%), effectiveness (7.9/10 vs 4.9/10), and clarity (8/10 vs 4/10), all <i>P</i> < .001. Participants also favored in-ear devices in usability assessments. Sound levels recorded were comparable between groups. In conclusion, in-ear communication is safe and effective in orthopedic settings, potentially enhancing efficiency and safety. These devices can mitigate loud noises, benefiting surgeon well-being and patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arthroplasty Today
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2024.101481
Primary Topic
Wireless Body Area Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wireless In-Ear Communication for Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Simulated Operating Room Evaluation

Alexus M. Cooper, Samuel Rosas, Blake Dunson, Taylor R Wood et al.
Arthroplasty Today
Wireless Body Area Networks
article

Wireless In-Ear Communication for Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Simulated Operating Room Evaluation

Alexus M. Cooper, Samuel Rosas, Blake Dunson, Taylor R Wood, Johannes F. Plate, Maxwell K. Langfitt, Bryce W Polascik
article en

Abstract

Effective communication is vital for patient safety, yet failures are common, often due to outdated methods. This study aimed to assess whether in-ear communication devices improve communication in orthopedic surgery simulations compared to traditional loud voice methods. Fifteen participants underwent simulations using both in-ear wireless devices and standard communication. Results showed significant improvements with in-ear devices in correctly identifying phrases (78.6% vs 44%), effectiveness (7.9/10 vs 4.9/10), and clarity (8/10 vs 4/10), all <i>P</i> < .001. Participants also favored in-ear devices in usability assessments. Sound levels recorded were comparable between groups. In conclusion, in-ear communication is safe and effective in orthopedic settings, potentially enhancing efficiency and safety. These devices can mitigate loud noises, benefiting surgeon well-being and patient outcomes.

Arthroplasty TodayVol. 29
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Wireless Body Area Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.