Spotting Portfolio Greenwashing in Environmental Funds

Abstract This paper examines greenwashing practices in environmental funds. We utilize a unique data set of US equity mutual fund holdings between 2012 and 2021 to calculate the funds’ carbon footprints. Using a difference-in-differences analysis, we find that, following their commitments to sustainability, environmental funds fail to reduce their carbon footprints relative to a matched group of conventional funds. We also find, using an event study, a significant increase in the flows of environmental funds in response to these commitments. The combination of the failure to reduce carbon footprints and the surge in inflows provides evidence of greenwashing by environmental funds, raising concerns about their fiduciary duty. Our findings also show that greenwashers tend to initially have low flows and high portfolio carbon emissions suggesting that they announce their commitments to sustainability just to attract investors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05783-z
Citations
23
Primary Topic
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spotting Portfolio Greenwashing in Environmental Funds

Tapas Kumar Mishra, Simon Wolfe, Rabab Abouarab
23 citations
Journal of Business Ethics
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
12.40
article

Spotting Portfolio Greenwashing in Environmental Funds

Tapas Kumar Mishra, Simon Wolfe, Rabab Abouarab
article en
23 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines greenwashing practices in environmental funds. We utilize a unique data set of US equity mutual fund holdings between 2012 and 2021 to calculate the funds’ carbon footprints. Using a difference-in-differences analysis, we find that, following their commitments to sustainability, environmental funds fail to reduce their carbon footprints relative to a matched group of conventional funds. We also find, using an event study, a significant increase in the flows of environmental funds in response to these commitments. The combination of the failure to reduce carbon footprints and the surge in inflows provides evidence of greenwashing by environmental funds, raising concerns about their fiduciary duty. Our findings also show that greenwashers tend to initially have low flows and high portfolio carbon emissions suggesting that they announce their commitments to sustainability just to attract investors.

Journal of Business EthicsVol. 197(4)
University of Southampton (GB)
University of Southampton
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
12.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Spotting Portfolio Greenwashing in Environmental Funds — Tapas Kumar Mishra, Simon Wolfe, et al. · Journal of Business Ethics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS