How can we conceptualise the current position of the retrospective PhD through published work in British Universities?

The PhD by retrospective published work remains an under-researched area within doctoral education. Introduced into the United Kingdom (UK) in 1966, this variant of PhD is one of several models of doctoral qualification that exist across the globe that include published research in the final submission. Although the retrospective model is an established way of obtaining a PhD through the inclusion of published research it has, together with the prospective 'three-paper' PhD, remained largely peripheral within the British HE sector. This paper places the discussion of this variant of the PhD by published work into its intellectual and instrumental contexts through an examination of epistemological and environmental drivers. This paper is informed by data generated through a series of online surveys of the regulations across the HE sector, the British Library's EThOS database, and responses from 20 universities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Higher Education Research & Development
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2024.2385363
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How can we conceptualise the current position of the retrospective PhD through published work in British Universities?

David William Stoten
Higher Education Research & Development
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
article

How can we conceptualise the current position of the retrospective PhD through published work in British Universities?

David William Stoten
article en

Abstract

The PhD by retrospective published work remains an under-researched area within doctoral education. Introduced into the United Kingdom (UK) in 1966, this variant of PhD is one of several models of doctoral qualification that exist across the globe that include published research in the final submission. Although the retrospective model is an established way of obtaining a PhD through the inclusion of published research it has, together with the prospective 'three-paper' PhD, remained largely peripheral within the British HE sector. This paper places the discussion of this variant of the PhD by published work into its intellectual and instrumental contexts through an examination of epistemological and environmental drivers. This paper is informed by data generated through a series of online surveys of the regulations across the HE sector, the British Library's EThOS database, and responses from 20 universities.

Higher Education Research & DevelopmentVol. 43(8)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How can we conceptualise the current position of the retrospective PhD through published work in British Universities? — David William Stoten · Higher Education Research & Development (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS