An adaptive approach to noisy annotations in scientific information extraction

Despite recent advances in large language models (LLMs), the best effectiveness in information extraction (IE) is still achieved by fine-tuned models, hence the need for manually annotated datasets to train them. However, collecting human annotations for IE, especially for scientific IE, where expert annotators are often required, is expensive and time-consuming. Another issue widely discussed in the IE community is noisy annotations. Mislabelled training samples can hamper the effectiveness of trained models. In this paper, we propose a solution to alleviate problems originating from the high cost and difficulty of the annotation process. Our method distinguishes clean training samples from noisy samples and then employs weighted weakly supervised learning (WWSL) to leverage noisy annotations. Evaluation of Named Entity Recognition (NER) and Relation Classification (RC) tasks in Scientific IE demonstrates the substantial impact of detecting clean samples. Experimental results highlight that our method, utilising clean and noisy samples with WWSL, outperforms the baseline RoBERTa on NER (+4.28, +4.59, +29.27, and +5.21 gain for the ADE, SciERC, STEM-ECR, and WLPC datasets, respectively) and the RC (+6.09 and +4.39 gain for the SciERC and WLPC datasets, respectively) tasks. Comprehensive analyses of our method reveal its advantages over state-of-the-art denoising baseline models in scientific NER. Moreover, the framework is general enough to be adapted to different NLP tasks or domains, which means it could be useful in the broader NLP community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Processing & Management
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103857
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Data Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An adaptive approach to noisy annotations in scientific information extraction

Maciej Rybiński, Stephen Wan, Necva Bölücü, Xiang Dai
3 citations
Information Processing & Management
Machine Learning and Data Classification
1.04
article

An adaptive approach to noisy annotations in scientific information extraction

Maciej Rybiński, Stephen Wan, Necva Bölücü, Xiang Dai
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Despite recent advances in large language models (LLMs), the best effectiveness in information extraction (IE) is still achieved by fine-tuned models, hence the need for manually annotated datasets to train them. However, collecting human annotations for IE, especially for scientific IE, where expert annotators are often required, is expensive and time-consuming. Another issue widely discussed in the IE community is noisy annotations. Mislabelled training samples can hamper the effectiveness of trained models. In this paper, we propose a solution to alleviate problems originating from the high cost and difficulty of the annotation process. Our method distinguishes clean training samples from noisy samples and then employs weighted weakly supervised learning (WWSL) to leverage noisy annotations. Evaluation of Named Entity Recognition (NER) and Relation Classification (RC) tasks in Scientific IE demonstrates the substantial impact of detecting clean samples. Experimental results highlight that our method, utilising clean and noisy samples with WWSL, outperforms the baseline RoBERTa on NER (+4.28, +4.59, +29.27, and +5.21 gain for the ADE, SciERC, STEM-ECR, and WLPC datasets, respectively) and the RC (+6.09 and +4.39 gain for the SciERC and WLPC datasets, respectively) tasks. Comprehensive analyses of our method reveal its advantages over state-of-the-art denoising baseline models in scientific NER. Moreover, the framework is general enough to be adapted to different NLP tasks or domains, which means it could be useful in the broader NLP community.

Information Processing & ManagementVol. 61(6)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), Data61 (AU)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Machine Learning and Data Classification
1.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An adaptive approach to noisy annotations in scientific information extraction — Maciej Rybiński, Stephen Wan, et al. · Information Processing & Management (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS