An interpretable isoflux-based observer for plasma shape control errors in tokamaks

In tokamaks, plasma shape control is often achieved through a so-called isoflux approach that regulates the poloidal flux differences between a reference point and a set of control points and magnetic field values at suitable locations to obtain the desired shape. Despite its simplicity, this approach presents two primary drawbacks: first, a method is needed to translate desired shape modifications, e.g. , radial or vertical shifts, into variations of the poloidal flux and magnetic field references; second, interpreting controller performance metrics may not be straightforward, since control errors are expressed in terms of physical quantities, i.e. , flux differences, magnetic fields, that cannot be directly related to positional errors. In this work, we propose a comprehensive methodology to establish relationships that link variations of poloidal flux and magnetic field values concerning a nominal plasma equilibrium in a predefined set of shape control points to local deformations of the Last Closed Flux Surface (LCFS). The effectiveness of this approach is demonstrated on the Tokamak à Configuration Variable (TCV) model through extensive simulations that consider various plasma configurations and shape modifications. • Isoflux methods control plasma shape by adjusting poloidal fluxes and magnetic fields. • Translate and interpreting control errors into shape modifications is challenging. • Shape observer to estimate deformations of the LCFS using flux and field variations. • Demonstration of the effectiveness of the shape observer on the TCV Tokamak.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fusion Engineering and Design
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2024.114618
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An interpretable isoflux-based observer for plasma shape control errors in tokamaks

Alessandro Tenaglia, S. Coda, A. Merle, Adriano Mele et al.
1 citations
Fusion Engineering and Design
Magnetic confinement fusion research
0.66
article

An interpretable isoflux-based observer for plasma shape control errors in tokamaks

Alessandro Tenaglia, S. Coda, A. Merle, Adriano Mele, F. Felici, Federico Pesamosca, Daniele Carnevale
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In tokamaks, plasma shape control is often achieved through a so-called isoflux approach that regulates the poloidal flux differences between a reference point and a set of control points and magnetic field values at suitable locations to obtain the desired shape. Despite its simplicity, this approach presents two primary drawbacks: first, a method is needed to translate desired shape modifications, e.g. , radial or vertical shifts, into variations of the poloidal flux and magnetic field references; second, interpreting controller performance metrics may not be straightforward, since control errors are expressed in terms of physical quantities, i.e. , flux differences, magnetic fields, that cannot be directly related to positional errors. In this work, we propose a comprehensive methodology to establish relationships that link variations of poloidal flux and magnetic field values concerning a nominal plasma equilibrium in a predefined set of shape control points to local deformations of the Last Closed Flux Surface (LCFS). The effectiveness of this approach is demonstrated on the Tokamak à Configuration Variable (TCV) model through extensive simulations that consider various plasma configurations and shape modifications. • Isoflux methods control plasma shape by adjusting poloidal fluxes and magnetic fields. • Translate and interpreting control errors into shape modifications is challenging. • Shape observer to estimate deformations of the LCFS using flux and field variations. • Demonstration of the effectiveness of the shape observer on the TCV Tokamak.

Fusion Engineering and DesignVol. 207
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), Policlinico Tor Vergata (IT), Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (DE), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Swiss Foundation for Anesthesia Research, EUROfusion, Serina Therapeutics, European Commission, European Geosciences Union, Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation, Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
0.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.