Interpreting Cohort Profiles of Life Cycle Earnings Volatility

We present new estimates of earnings volatility over time and the life cycle for men and women by race and human capital, using Social Security earnings linked to the Current Population Survey. From the late 1970s to the mid-1990s, there is a strong negative trend in earnings volatility driven by a decline in transitory variance. From the mid-1990s, there is relative stability in trends of male earnings volatility due to an increase in the variance of permanent shocks. Cohort analyses indicate that earnings volatility is U-shaped, driven by large permanent shocks early and later in the life cycle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Labor Economics
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/732667
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Global Health Care Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpreting Cohort Profiles of Life Cycle Earnings Volatility

Christopher R. Bollinger, Charles Hokayem, James P. Ziliak, Richard W. Blundell
3 citations
Journal of Labor Economics
Global Health Care Issues
2.55
article

Interpreting Cohort Profiles of Life Cycle Earnings Volatility

Christopher R. Bollinger, Charles Hokayem, James P. Ziliak, Richard W. Blundell
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We present new estimates of earnings volatility over time and the life cycle for men and women by race and human capital, using Social Security earnings linked to the Current Population Survey. From the late 1970s to the mid-1990s, there is a strong negative trend in earnings volatility driven by a decline in transitory variance. From the mid-1990s, there is relative stability in trends of male earnings volatility due to an increase in the variance of permanent shocks. Cohort analyses indicate that earnings volatility is U-shaped, driven by large permanent shocks early and later in the life cycle.

Journal of Labor EconomicsVol. 43(S1)
United States Census Bureau (US), Institute for Fiscal Studies (GB), University of Kentucky (US), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Global Health Care Issues
2.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.