Genetic risk stratification and outcomes among treatment-naive patients with AML treated with venetoclax and azacitidine
The European LeukemiaNet (ELN) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) genetic risk classification systems are based on response to intensive chemotherapy; their ability to discriminate outcomes in older patients treated with venetoclax-azacitidine may be suboptimal. This pooled analysis of the phase 3 VIALE-A trial (NCT02993523) and phase 1b study (NCT02203773) examined prognostic stratification according to the 2017 and 2022 ELN risk classifications and derived new molecular signatures differentiating venetoclax-azacitidine-treated patients based on overall survival (OS). Overall, 279 patients treated with venetoclax-azacitidine and 113 patients treated with placebo-azacitidine were analyzed. The ELN 2017 or 2022 prognostic criteria classified most patients as adverse-risk AML (60.2% and 72.8% for venetoclax-azacitidine and 65.5% and 75.2% for placebo-azacitidine, respectively). Although outcomes with venetoclax-azacitidine improved across all ELN risk groups compared with placebo-azacitidine, ELN classification systems poorly discriminated venetoclax-azacitidine outcomes. By applying a bioinformatic algorithm, new molecular signatures were derived differentiating OS outcomes with venetoclax-azacitidine. The mutational status of TP53, FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD), NRAS, and KRAS categorized patients into higher-, intermediate-, and lower-benefit groups (52%, 25%, and 23% of patients, respectively), each associated with a distinct median OS (26.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 20.2-32.7]; 12.1 months [95% CI, 7.3-15.2]; and 5.5 months [95% CI, 2.8-7.6], respectively). ELN prognostic classifiers did not provide clinically meaningful risk stratification of OS outcomes in patients treated with venetoclax-azacitidine. TP53, FLT3-ITD, NRAS, and KRAS mutation status allows the classification of these patients into 3 risk groups with distinct differences in median OS. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02993523 and #NCT02203773.
Authors
- Andre C. Schuh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2869-852X)
- Andrew H. Wei (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7514-3298)
- Sunil Babu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5085-6905)
- Courtney Denton Dinardo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9003-0390)
- Christian Récher (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3332-4525)
- Yan Sun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7856-7195)
- Vinod A. Pullarkat (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9129-3424)
- Daniel A. Pollyea (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6519-4860)
- Michael J. Thirman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5154-9499)
- Keith William Pratz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1284-8266)
- Grace Ku (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7808-1769)
- Brenda Chyla (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2594-9696)
- Brian A. Jonas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4921-5809)
- Hartmut Döhner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2116-5536)
- Monique Dail (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2687-8829)
- Jalaja Potluri (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1146-8253)
- Xiaotong Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6890-2068)
- Zihuan Liu
Institutions
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
- Amgen (United States) (US)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research (AU)
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU)
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA)
- AbbVie (United States) (US)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (FR)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Fort Wayne Medical Institute (US)
- City of Hope (US)
- University Hospital Ulm (DE)
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- University of Colorado Denver (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Blood
- Published
- 2024-08-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2024024944
- Citations
- 114
- Primary Topic
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 51.80