Cereal-maize vs. legume-maize double-cropping: Impact on crop productivity and nitrogen dynamics under flood-irrigated Mediterranean conditions

Double-cropping is an interesting diversification strategy to increase profitability and sustainability. Besides, by including legumes, it may reduce the N inputs dependency. However, its management with flood irrigation can be challenging. The was the evaluation of the impact of two double-cropping and different nitrogen (N) rates on productivity and N dynamics under flood irrigation. Two double-cropping (barley-maize; pea-maize) and three N rates (unfertilized, 0N; medium: MN; high rate, HN) were evaluated in a field experiment located in NE Spain during two years. In barley-maize, N rates were 0, 125 and 250 kg N ha−1, and 0, 200 and 400 kg N ha−1 for barley and maize phases, respectively. In pea-maize, pea did not receive N, and the MN and HN rates in the maize were reduced (150 and 350 kg N ha−1, respectively). Crop productivity and N uptake were evaluated. The economic return and N use efficiency (NUE) were calculated. Soil inorganic N (Nmin) was measured after harvest. The pea-maize double-cropping allowed the saving of N fertilizer without yield penalties. Besides, a pre-crop effect of pea in the maize yield was observed. Regarding the cropping system, pea-maize obtained a higher economic return the first year. Besides, the economic return was higher the first year, due to crop penalties. In general, NUE was greater in 0N, and no differences were observed between fertilized treatments. Soil Nmin after pea/barley was higher the first year, coincident with a higher productivity. After maize harvest, the barley-maize led to larger residual Nmin. Therefore, in this study, pea-maize allowed a reduction in the N rate, showed greater potential to increase the economic return and reduced the N leaching risk. However, crop yield penalties associated with flood-irrigation, indicate that farmers should be aware of facing a more challenging management or consider other irrigation method to ensure profitability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101357
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cereal-maize vs. legume-maize double-cropping: Impact on crop productivity and nitrogen dynamics under flood-irrigated Mediterranean conditions

Jorge Álvaro‐Fuentes, María Alonso‐Ayuso, Victoria Lafuente, Samuel Franco‐Luesma et al.
1 citations
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
0.57
article

Cereal-maize vs. legume-maize double-cropping: Impact on crop productivity and nitrogen dynamics under flood-irrigated Mediterranean conditions

Jorge Álvaro‐Fuentes, María Alonso‐Ayuso, Victoria Lafuente, Samuel Franco‐Luesma, Ana Bielsa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Double-cropping is an interesting diversification strategy to increase profitability and sustainability. Besides, by including legumes, it may reduce the N inputs dependency. However, its management with flood irrigation can be challenging. The was the evaluation of the impact of two double-cropping and different nitrogen (N) rates on productivity and N dynamics under flood irrigation. Two double-cropping (barley-maize; pea-maize) and three N rates (unfertilized, 0N; medium: MN; high rate, HN) were evaluated in a field experiment located in NE Spain during two years. In barley-maize, N rates were 0, 125 and 250 kg N ha−1, and 0, 200 and 400 kg N ha−1 for barley and maize phases, respectively. In pea-maize, pea did not receive N, and the MN and HN rates in the maize were reduced (150 and 350 kg N ha−1, respectively). Crop productivity and N uptake were evaluated. The economic return and N use efficiency (NUE) were calculated. Soil inorganic N (Nmin) was measured after harvest. The pea-maize double-cropping allowed the saving of N fertilizer without yield penalties. Besides, a pre-crop effect of pea in the maize yield was observed. Regarding the cropping system, pea-maize obtained a higher economic return the first year. Besides, the economic return was higher the first year, due to crop penalties. In general, NUE was greater in 0N, and no differences were observed between fertilized treatments. Soil Nmin after pea/barley was higher the first year, coincident with a higher productivity. After maize harvest, the barley-maize led to larger residual Nmin. Therefore, in this study, pea-maize allowed a reduction in the N rate, showed greater potential to increase the economic return and reduced the N leaching risk. However, crop yield penalties associated with flood-irrigation, indicate that farmers should be aware of facing a more challenging management or consider other irrigation method to ensure profitability.

Journal of Agriculture and Food ResearchVol. 18
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), Estación Experimental de Aula Dei (ES)
European Commission, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Horizon 2020
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.