Evaluation of the mechanical shock testing standards for electric vehicle batteries

The safety of Li-ion batteries (LIB) has become an important issue with the continuously increased use of electric vehicles (EV) in the world. In a survivable vehicle crash, when the vehicle needs to maintain structural integrity, crash-induced shock may damage EV's LIB. Therefore, an evaluation of commonly used mechanical shock test standards for EV battery module and pack is performed in this study against the crash-induced shock signals collected from National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) tests. Various shock analysis methods including signal characteristics in time domain, power spectral density (PSD) and shock response spectrum (SRS) in frequency domain, and the acceleration/velocity-change diagram are used for the evaluation. It is found that most peak accelerations of NCAP shock signals significantly exceed the peak accelerations specified in shock testing standards. Crash-induced shocks cannot be fully represented by the half-sine pulse adopted in shock testing standards. In both time and frequency domains, the existing shock testing standards generally underestimate the severities of the crash-induced shocks, and therefore, are non-conservative. It also shows that the correct selection of a filter for the processing of the original crash-induced shock signal is crucial for the specification of EV battery shock environment and shock response analyses. The results obtained in this research can support the development of more reliable shock testing standards for EV batteries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Impact Engineering
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.105077
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the mechanical shock testing standards for electric vehicle batteries

Yuyang Xing, Q.M. Li
13 citations
International Journal of Impact Engineering
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
2.64
article

Evaluation of the mechanical shock testing standards for electric vehicle batteries

Yuyang Xing, Q.M. Li
article en
13 citations

Abstract

The safety of Li-ion batteries (LIB) has become an important issue with the continuously increased use of electric vehicles (EV) in the world. In a survivable vehicle crash, when the vehicle needs to maintain structural integrity, crash-induced shock may damage EV's LIB. Therefore, an evaluation of commonly used mechanical shock test standards for EV battery module and pack is performed in this study against the crash-induced shock signals collected from National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) tests. Various shock analysis methods including signal characteristics in time domain, power spectral density (PSD) and shock response spectrum (SRS) in frequency domain, and the acceleration/velocity-change diagram are used for the evaluation. It is found that most peak accelerations of NCAP shock signals significantly exceed the peak accelerations specified in shock testing standards. Crash-induced shocks cannot be fully represented by the half-sine pulse adopted in shock testing standards. In both time and frequency domains, the existing shock testing standards generally underestimate the severities of the crash-induced shocks, and therefore, are non-conservative. It also shows that the correct selection of a filter for the processing of the original crash-induced shock signal is crucial for the specification of EV battery shock environment and shock response analyses. The results obtained in this research can support the development of more reliable shock testing standards for EV batteries.

International Journal of Impact EngineeringVol. 194
University of Manchester (GB)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
2.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.