Oblique pole-side crash assessment using the six-year-old HBM PIPER

Side impact crashes are one of the most dangerous impact scenarios that a child can suffer. Studies by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) have shown that the head and Thorax regions are affected severely. The objective of this work is to perform a numerical evaluation of the oblique pole-side test considering the FMVSS 214-P standard to estimate the Head, Neck, and Thorax injuries for a six-year-old child positioned in the rear seat without any Child Restraint System, two configurations were performed for the oblique pole-side impact: a nearside and a far-side positioning configuration. A six-year-old Human Body Model (HBM) denominated Scalable PIPER Child Model, and the Ford Explorer 2003 were used to perform the test in the LS DYNA® software to assess the biomechanics involved in the crash scenarios. The approach considered a comparative case study with the baseline of the six-year-old child PIPER model to ensure that the positioning adjustment has not affected the mesh quality and interior components for the PIPER child model. The outcomes obtained in case 1 show that the modified PIPER child model has slight outcomes at the shoulder and pelvis zone due to the differences in the body positioning and not by the mesh or the interior interaction between the components. The outcomes obtained in case 2 reflect that the nearside setup obtained the higher measurements for the child occupant. The <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi> <mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for Head at nearside test to overcome the Side Criteria established by the Assessment Protocol Child Occupant Protection by Euro NCAP, the kinematics behavior demonstrates the importance of researching children in side crashes to enhance child security, especially in the oblique pole side impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heliyon
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35927
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oblique pole-side crash assessment using the six-year-old HBM PIPER

Luis Martínez Sáez, Christopher René Torres‐SanMiguel, José Luis Torres-Ariza
2 citations
Heliyon
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
0.84
article

Oblique pole-side crash assessment using the six-year-old HBM PIPER

Luis Martínez Sáez, Christopher René Torres‐SanMiguel, José Luis Torres-Ariza
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Side impact crashes are one of the most dangerous impact scenarios that a child can suffer. Studies by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) have shown that the head and Thorax regions are affected severely. The objective of this work is to perform a numerical evaluation of the oblique pole-side test considering the FMVSS 214-P standard to estimate the Head, Neck, and Thorax injuries for a six-year-old child positioned in the rear seat without any Child Restraint System, two configurations were performed for the oblique pole-side impact: a nearside and a far-side positioning configuration. A six-year-old Human Body Model (HBM) denominated Scalable PIPER Child Model, and the Ford Explorer 2003 were used to perform the test in the LS DYNA® software to assess the biomechanics involved in the crash scenarios. The approach considered a comparative case study with the baseline of the six-year-old child PIPER model to ensure that the positioning adjustment has not affected the mesh quality and interior components for the PIPER child model. The outcomes obtained in case 1 show that the modified PIPER child model has slight outcomes at the shoulder and pelvis zone due to the differences in the body positioning and not by the mesh or the interior interaction between the components. The outcomes obtained in case 2 reflect that the nearside setup obtained the higher measurements for the child occupant. The <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi> <mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for Head at nearside test to overcome the Side Criteria established by the Assessment Protocol Child Occupant Protection by Euro NCAP, the kinematics behavior demonstrates the importance of researching children in side crashes to enhance child security, especially in the oblique pole side impact.

HeliyonVol. 10(16)
Instituto Politécnico Nacional (MX), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Secretaría de Investigación y Posgrado, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, European Regional Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
0.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.